So, usually I'm a stickler for official pregnancy what-you-can-eat-what-you-can't-eat guidelines except for the occasional extra coffee
But I'm not convinced by the logic behind only two oily fish portions a week and here is why ...
NHS website says:
Women who are planning a pregnancy or who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding should eat no more than two portions of oily fish a week. This is because pollutants found in oily fish may affect the future development of a baby in the womb. www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodfood/Pages/fish-shellfish.aspx
Yet, another NHS page says it's basically okay to eat two tuna steaks a week in pregnancy www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/should-pregnant-and-breastfeeding-women-avoid-some-types-of-fish.aspx?CategoryID=54
Presumably, those two tuna steaks would be your two oily fish ration all used up.
Here's the problem: tuna, a large fish that lives a long time, much longer than the humble sardine e.g., has way higher levels of mercury/pollutants than the smaller oily fish. So if it's okay to eat two tuna steaks a week, surely that means it's okay to eat a lot more than two portions of sardines or mackeral a week, iyswim? Because there's way less pollutants in the small fish.
Or am I missing something?
Thanks : )