Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Quad test as opposed to triple test

4 replies

cornwallsharon · 04/09/2015 09:51

So I went for my '12 week' scan last week, only to find out that I was 16 weeks gone - oops!

So they had explained all about the Down's testing and I took it all in, but when they realised how far gone I was, they couldnt do the nuchal fold measurement at the scan and I've had to have a 'quad' test instead of the normal triple test.

By that point I was a bit overwhelmed and didnt really take in what they were telling me.

So what is the difference between the triple and quad tests? They said I would get a phonecall within 3 days if the triple test had a high possibility, but that with the quad test it would be a letter in 2 weeks regardless of the result.

Is the quad test more or less accurate??

Thanks!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Skiptonlass · 04/09/2015 11:49

Quad is significantly less accurate. I think from memory it picks up 75-80% of downs cases, depending on how old the mother is.

Sighing · 04/09/2015 21:04

Similar thing to me, I was 14+4 at my 12 week. No phone call as yet for a high risk. I think she said the latest would be a week from the scan, but that's probably area dependent.

cornwallsharon · 13/09/2015 20:41

Thanks for the replies! We have now received the results back and they were a 1 in 12771 chance of of a downs baby. What I don't understand is the relationship between the accuracy of the test and the probability result. So there is only an 80% chance that the probability is 1 in 12,000?

I'm still confused! (Although obviously reassured to some degree by the low risk factor we've been given).

OP posts:
Skiptonlass · 14/09/2015 07:22

That's actually a very incisive question :)

The 80% figure refers to the sensitivity of the test. That measures the proportion of true positives that are identified. So the quad test picks up about 80% of positive cases.

The specificity of the test identifies the true negatives - I.e. All babies without the issue.

Ideally you'd have a 100% specific and sensitive test but this doesn't happen.

They use a cut off off about 1:150 as a 'positive' trigger to offer amnio, so you have a low 'negative' result. (With the caveat that you can never say positive or negative for sure on a screening test!)

But what you want to know is what are the chances I'm in the missed positive group and the baby is affected? ?

From this webpage, which explains it very nicely: www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/service-1/antenatal-screening/screening-tests/the-quadruple-test

Detection rate :
80% of women with pregnancies affected with Down's syndrome will receive a screen-positive result. (The remaining 20% of women with pregnancies affected with Down's syndrome will receive a screen-negative result.)

False positive rate:
3.5% of women whose pregnancies are not affected with Down's syndrome will receive a screen-positive result. (96.5% of women whose pregnancies are not affected with Down's syndrome will receive a screen-negative result.)

Odds of being affected given a positive result (OAPR)
1:15 ?? Among women in the screen-positive group, 1 woman will have a pregnancy with Down's syndrome for every 15 who do not.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page