Nope, I think the OP does mean anti-E.
monkey29, I had anti-E with my second and third pregnancies. In my second pregnancy, it wasn't a problem, as the titre remained at 1:16 throughout. I did only have infrequent checks during this pregnancy. Baby was born at 40+2, no problems (despite the fact I had appendicitis at 31 weeks, but that's unrelated to the anti-E!).
Pg with number 3, my first anti-E level was higher (I think 1:32) so I did get the 4-week checks that you've read about. I also had frequent scans, to Doppler the blood flow through the cerebral artery, as there was the possibility of anaemia in utero. My anti-E levels did fluctuate, up to a maximum of 1:128, I think. I was induced at 40 weeks, as the foetal medicine specialist said it would be better to get the baby out as any consequences of the anti-E were easier to treat once she was out. My baby was delivered at a weight of 8lbs 11 oz, no problems. However, she developed severe jaundice (haemolytic disease of the newborn) at 12 hours old, and was admitted to SCBU, put under lights and a drip and naso-gastric tube put in, as she was struggling to feed. She was discharged from SCBU at 5 days old and from hospital at 7 days old, with further follow-ups. She was discharged from the paediatricians at 5 months and there have been no further consequences. She's now a fit, healthy stroppy 6yo.
The Foetal Medicine medics said this was unusual, most often there are no or mild consequences from anti-E. It's not as common nor as risky as anti-D. They said they only saw 1-2 cases of it a year max, and this was at a large national maternity referral centre. They also said they had not had a baby suffer ongoing or chronic problems from anti-E, in their experience. Once they knew it was there, they could put the protocols in place to monitor and be ready to treat.
If you'd like to know anything else, please feel free to PM me. It's never nice to have a worry like this in your pregnancy 