Rhesus Negative - Do I need an injection this time around

[Dorasmum]

Hello all, I am new to this forum, I have just found out that I am pregnant with No. 2 - 6.5 weeks.

My question, if you can help, I am rhesus neg - I did not need injections following my daughter's birth as she is the same. Do I need an injection now that I know that I am carrying again? I don't want to miscarry because I missed getting it?

Thanks

Yes you do, you will be given one at 28 weeks aswel, i am reshus neg to and that wheat i have been told, i dont know if it varies from area to area though.

I am rh neg, as is my dh. Therefore any children we have will be Rh neg and I don't need any anti-D injections. Do you know your husband's blood type?

Hi, I needed the jab after ds1 was born because he was +ve. When I had ds2 they had changed their policy and I had it before he was even born, whether he was or not.

No, not sure of his blood type - do know that it is not the same as mine though. Think he is one of the quite common ones.
Thanks for response

it depends on where you live as to whether you get any anti-d before you give birth. I live in Scotland (South Lanarkshire) and we dont get the injections at 28 and 34 weeks whereas other health authorities do give them. I will just get one if I have a bleed or a fall and then after the birth if the babies blood type is positive. I got the injection after the birth the last time as dd must have been rhesus positive.

If it is not your health authorities policy to give the anti-d before the birth your bloods will be tested a couple of times to see if you have any antibodies building up and will get anti-d if required.

His ABO type doesn't matter, just whether it's rh neg or not.

I am also reh neg. I saw my mw at my scan appointment at 12 weeks and was told I need to come back at 28 & 34 weeks as they are now offering antid jabs during pregnancy routinly instead of following the birth or following any bleed during the pregnancy. Research has shown that if a woman did have a bleed during the pregnancy then if she was vaccinated with antid prior to this then it makes it safer iykwim.

I wouldn't worry now but would discuss it with your mw following your scan.

BTW as charlee said, this may be regional. I'm northwest.

btw I did have it following dd's birth. No idea her blood group and neither does my mw know {shock] but records show her being + so opposite to mine.

Also the anti d jabs being given are optional here. They recommend it but make you aware that it's from the usa and is a human product.

I've just posted on the other thread, if you are having the jabs ask for them in your thigh, not your upper arm where it stings like hell!