I'm so sorry you're dealing with this worry. With such high odds I am not surprised you have opted to go for invasive testing and the quicker results (rather than the new non-invasive tests that take two weeks)
My last pregnancy I had a 1 in 34 and waited it out as there were no non-invasive options then and we wouldn't terminate. DS has typical chromosomes. It was ALL in the bloodwork - the nuchal measurement was fine.
This pregnancy I had a borderline nuchal (2.7mm) and again appalling bloods, my risk was like yours - 1 in 5.
Due to what happened to me last time and the new tests, I went for the Harmony test at 10 weeks so I had my results before I even had the NT screening at 12 weeks and those results show a chromosomally normal female. I don't know what I would have chosen to do without already having had Harmony and I'm so sorry you're in this situation.
What are your numbers? My bHCG was the driving factor this time at 5.43MoM, far above normal range of 1-2MoM. Last time I had 0.23MoM PAPP-A which is in the bottom few percentile.
During my time waiting it out with my last pregnancy I saw a lot of numbers and a lot of results. By and large, and this is purely anecdotal, it seemed to be very rare for a baby with a normal nuchal and bad bloodwork to actually be positive for a trisomy.
Was there anything else on your scan besides the nuchal fold measurement that could be driving the high risk? Absent nasal bone, possible heart issues? It seems like a very high risk number given the good nuchal measurement and your age to be based on bloodwork alone.
Good luck with the CVS tomorrow and with the results.