Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

PPH and low platelets

5 replies

LotsOfNettleTea · 27/10/2013 12:18

Hello :) I'm 3 days overdue with my third child. My platelets have dropped with all 3 and I have been diagnosed with ITP rather than gestational low platelets due to them going as low as 37 when I went into labour with my last son. But I havent responded to any treatment so the consultant has suggested that it'sjust how my body responds to pregnancy and that I may need a platelet transfusion in labour. The worry is that my blood won't clot properly under a certain level. I haven't been too concerned due to my belief that I didn't bleed much with my previous births (levels were around 80 with both thanks to platelet transfusion)but my notes show a PPH of 500ml with my first and a loss of 400ml with my second. Now I'm terrified of bleeding to death :( my first birth was long, induced to speed it up and required an episiotomy but my second was a lot quicker and easier. I'm concerned that it was never mentioned that I hemmoraged. Sorry if that makes no sense, just wondered if anyone had any advice or experience, I'm really worrying myself now when I should be chilling out. Thanks :)

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Hopefully · 27/10/2013 12:26

No real advice, but AFAIK the average blood loss during a normal vaginal delivery is 400-500ml, which is probably why no one has mentioned it before. For reference from the point of view of a 'normal' pregnancy PPH, I lost 1.4l in my first delivery and didn't need a transfusion (with hindsight I could have done with one though!) and lost about 1000ml in my last birth (ELCS) and I remember them debating whether to class it as a 'proper' PPH. Hope that helps a little!

WorriedMouse · 27/10/2013 12:32

I had a pph of 2.5l and I'm about to have baby 2. I've been told that going overdue is dangerous as is induction. I'm booked for section at 39+4. I would talk to your consultant about it as soon as you can.

LotsOfNettleTea · 27/10/2013 12:43

Thanks both of you :) that does help put it into perspective Hopefully.WorriedMouse, I've never heard that about going overdue, is that because of the baby's size?as far as I know C-section comes with a much higher risk of bleeding than vaginal delivery which is why my consultant wants me to have the latter with my potential bleeding disorder. I suppose its more controlled though.

OP posts:
Hopefully · 27/10/2013 13:42

My reading around the subject suggests that haemorrhage is more likely with CS, and standard bleed is bigger. For me, it was a lesser risk than my horrendous natural delivery, but might be worth asking your consultant about.

WorriedMouse · 27/10/2013 14:33

Yes you do bleed more with a section but its controlled with very experienced staff. My pph was initially managed by a junior midwife and a recently qualified doctor and probably wasn't handled too well. Knowing I've a team of people and I'm having my baby at a specified time is reassuring. I also know that they will have blood ready should i need it. It was my decision in the end and i decided after the trauma the last time, i wanted a controlled environment. I bled a lot with a vd so i may bleed again at a section. Consultant said at my first appointment at 15 weeks that going overdue wouldn't be a good idea and induction was a definite no.

Good luck!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread