ooo sorry didn't notice replies to my post! To answer your questions, no I'm not being contradictory, I know how very, very awful and dangerous it can be if a tiny baby catches it (for example, they can cough so hard and so relentlessly they can break their own ribs) and believe me that's my reason for having the vaccination! The issues (or suspected issues) they had in the 70s/80s as far as I understand it, have been dealt with and are no longer concerns. As for my 12mo catching it despite being vaccinated, it is very, highly unlikely you will catch it once vaccinated, but, as my GP said at the time, they are just boosters (you can't give a full vaccination to a baby, you build up the vaccination over time - it's the best you can do), and my daughter was one of those 'one in a million' (or whatever the statistic is) that still caught it. Thankfully my 12mo, was just that, 12mo and not under 6m where it is far more dangerous. The vaccination also wears off over years so an adult that was vaccinated as a youngster might also catch whooping cough, hence the boosters being given to us all now.
Whooping cough, like many viruses and diseases, has years where it is more prevailant and other quieter years in between, this is just how nature works. This year (as we all know) it has been particularly bad so anyone unvaccinated (including all newborns during that first few weeks before they are able to be vaccinated) is far more likely to catch whooping cough than they might during the 'quiet' periods. I therefore think being offered the vaccination to help immunise our babies from birth is a fantastic idea. I can only assume it hasn't been offered this way before because of there being a number of 'quiet' years or that the booster has gone through testing and is now deemed safe to use in this way, or perhaps they didn't have the knowledge before that the vaccine could be passed on to the baby in this way.
I think I covered everything there?
All the best.