We did, and now I'm not sure whether we've done the right thing or not.
I hope this won't be too long but probably need to give a bit of background. I will be 14 weeks tomorrow and this is my fifth pregnancy with no surviving children. We lost our first pregnancy at 11 weeks to a missed miscarriage and then terminated the next three at 22 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 weeks due to a genetic disorder incompatible with life. The problem was picked up later in the second pregnancy as we had the standard dating scan at 12 weeks which wasn't looking for any issues, the equipment is less sensitive etc - then everything went wrong at the 20 week anomaly scan. For the subsequent pregnancies we were seen by a fetal medicine consultant at 12 weeks and the problems have been clear immediately. Although the doctors/geneticists haven't been able to locate the exact gene responsible for this, they were fairly certain that it would be an autosomal recessive condition meaning that with every pregnancy we would have a 1 in 4 chance of having an affected baby. I, of course, managed to convince myself that we would never be able to have a healthy pregnancy. They (docs) thought we had probably just been extremely unlucky in hitting the 1 in 4 on three consecutive occasions but couldn't guarantee it.
So, fast forwarding to this pregnancy, the usual total pressure and stress for the weeks between finding out I was pregnant and going to see the consultant, Sword of Damacles hanging over our heads etc. I even told work that I was unlikely to be in for a week following the appointment as I was so convinced we would be going straight to termination. Anyway, by some miracle, our consultant was not able to find any problems with this baby and is quite convinced that the genetic problem has not presented. As far as he is concerned we are now back at 'a level playing field' regarding our risks for this pregnancy. We had to go back and see him a fortnight after the first appointment, when we would need to decide whether or not to have Downs screening (this appointment was last Tuesday). DH and I talked round and round the issue for practically the whole fortnight but just couldn't get past what we would do if it came back high risk. Neither option of either having an amnio and him sticking a huge needle right next to the only healthy baby we have ever seen on a scan, or not having an amnio and the additional stress of then carrying on knowing we were high risk seemed acceptable to us.
Because of all this we decided not to have the testing, but now I'm wondering whether we've done the right thing. When I've been pregnant before, this triple testing was only available privately and the 16 week blood test was very much 'opt in'. Now that it's an 'opt out' scenario I can't help feeling like we've been reckless and should have just gritted our teeth and got on with it (I'm by nature a very compliant, biddable patient!). BUT I still can't get past what we would have done in a higher risk situation (I will be 37 on due date so relatively likely that we would have a higher risk). I feel like if this were a 'normal' pregnancy and didn't have our history we would just have gone for it without thinking much more about it, but this pregnancy seems so precious and fragile that the thought of putting it at any risk just for our own peace of mind just seems too much.
Sorry for going on, but I guess I'm just looking for reassurance that we might not have been the only ones to have opted out. Or have we been totally stupid and should we go and have the 16 week blood test instead?
Thanks for reading this far - sorry to go on.