Do you have an opinion on the "nub theory"?:
At around 12 weeks all embryos have the same structure for their genitalia, but for boys the angle of this "nub" is a bit different and more obvious. Apparently it is easier to tell if it is a boy. With girls "the nub" is more difficult to interpret.
In my previous pregnancy the sonographer said (correctly) "boy" at the scan. Friends had the same (correct) "boy" prediction. (These friends are scientists, so I became curious about this theory when they didn't write this off as rubbish.)
So far so good. I had a scan yesterday (13+2) and after the medical part was done I did indulge and asked "Can you tell if it is a boy or girl?". This time the sonographers said: "you can't tell so early, because the structure of the genitalia is the same for boy and girl at this stage". So no prediction..
Now......... my question: do you think that they didn't want to predict the gender, because it wasn't obviously a "boy"? Didn't they want to say because the nub wasn't that obvious and might be a girl?
(I am really grateful that everything went well at the scan, and that the baby is well. And although I am slightly biased for a girl, I'll be so happy if the baby is healthy and that is the main thing.)
But now this is out of the way, please indulge me for an afternoon..
(Btw all the scans I mentioned above were done in the same hospital, so I don't think they have a "not tell gender policy".)