Hi there. I was wondering if anyone could give me an opinion as to which of these two hospitals would be better, and whether a "nice" hospital beats distance?
I am 20 weeks and about to move house into a different area. We are currently booked in with the Royal London, which has been good, but not enough to make it worth travelling across London once we've moved. Our choices in our new area are Kings (which is about ten minutes away) and Thomas's (which I think will be anything between 20 minutes and 45+ depending on traffic). I really want to go to Thomas's as I have read good things about it, like having the option of a midwife led unit, visited a friend there who was very impressed and, also, rightly or wrongly, just think it sounds a much nicer place to give birth than Kings! Am I being really stupid to think it is worth travelling the extra distance - and am I right anyway in thinking that Thomas's is that much nicer than Kings in the first place?!
I would be really grateful for any opinions - at the moment, this feels like a really big decision (and I guess I will nevcer really know if I make the right one!). Thanks very much in advance.