I have been under consultant care for all 3 of my pregnancies because I have a very large fibroid on my uterus. I saw a mixture of midwives and doctors (including the consultant). I saw the consultant more in my first pregnancy than inthe the other two.
I had the same consultant for my first two pregnancies and got on very well with her. I felt safe, listened-too, and un-patronised. She was quite happy for me to labour on the birthing-centre side of the labour ward.
The consultant I saw in my third pregnancy, however, was completely different. She tried hard to push me into a highly medicalised birth and even used scare-tactics on me. She was very interventionist, bossy, and dismissive. (Friends of mine who were under her care for elective CS loved her.). Eventually the senior midwife talked to her on my behalf and persuaded her to sign me off for midwifery-led care during my labour.
I think consultants tend to see more abnormal pregnancies and births, and are therefore more likely to be protocol-led and interventionist, whereas midwives see plenty of very ordinary pregnancies and births, and are more likely to be open to allowing the woman to trust herself and only take over control of her labour if it is meducally justified.
On the whole, I liked having the safety-net of expert medical care, but, when it comes to labour, nothing beats an experienced midwife.
I know nothing about ovarian cysts. Why does having one require CS?