Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Estimated baby weight.....

12 replies

MissCKitty · 02/12/2010 13:57

Had a growth scan today at 31+5 and they are estimating baby at 4lbs. What are other peoples'estimated baby weights around this stage? Is it normal or am I having a big'un? lol Xmas Grin What approx would that make her her final birth weight?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
CTJ82 · 02/12/2010 20:31

If you have a look in your green notes there should be a individualised growth chart that the MW should update every time you get measured - on that chart there is a trajectory line that gives the estimated birth weight.

sotough · 02/12/2010 21:13

hi there
i had a growth scan last week, at 33 weeks, and mine was 4.8lb; they estimated the final weight would be between 7.7 and just under 8lb. not sure if that's any help but sounds like yours is about the same given you are a couple of weeks behind me...

FloraPost · 02/12/2010 22:26

I also had a growth scan today (31+6) and the estimate was 3.3lb.

BagofHolly · 02/12/2010 23:47

I had a scan today, am 32+2 and one twin is 4lb 8oz and the other is 5lb 8oz. In my scan notes there are charts to show what centile they're on for each perameter they measure. The sonographer said add half a pound a week each baby till term to get a rough idea of estimated delivery weight.

Kiki84 · 03/12/2010 10:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BagofHolly · 03/12/2010 11:26

That might be normal Kiki - we have scans at 12 and 20 weeks as standard here and all the measurements on each. I get extra cos it's twins.

Snowfalls108 · 03/12/2010 11:53

Growth scans can be horribly inaccurate.
I had a friend who told her baby was average size, so would be around 7-8lbs and ended up 10lbs 7!

FloraPost · 03/12/2010 14:14

Don't worry Kiki, I only get them because there was some concern about growth rate. They aren't routinely offered here.

RibenaBerry · 03/12/2010 14:17

What Snowballs said. I have two friends who were told that they were having huge babies and given dire warnings about sections. One was just over 7lbs and one just under. Another friend was told tiny and ended up with a 9lber.

Seems to me that it's only marginally more reliable than 'feel the bump and guess'. Although I am well aware that the plural of anecdote is not data.

CheeseChomper · 03/12/2010 14:17

I had a scan at 29 weeks exactly and baby was estimated at 3 pounds Smile

onimolap · 03/12/2010 14:30

Scans can't tell you the weight of the baby.

They can tell you its size by measuring length/circumference of various parts of the body - and then they can use averaged data sets to make onwards predictions. It's very inaccurate.

MissCKitty · 03/12/2010 20:05

onimolap I am aware that the scan won't give me exact baby weight. I know that its an estimation based on a collection of measurements. However what I was asking was what other women had experienced in relation to having a growth scan done at this stage and what their baby actually weighed in at.

kiki I am a type 1 diabetic so because of the risk of larger babies for diabetic moms I am having regular growth scans to determine whether I go full term or not.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page