Hi All
Lots of things to consider here.
Firstly the decision to store just the stem cells or the whole cord blood? I think that's an easy one...what do public cord blood banks that are involved in transplants do?...they store just the stem cells. As a scientist I know its much cheaper for the bank to just store the whole blood mixed with some cryopreservative and that using this in transplants would cause complications.
The second decision is whether to keep all of the cells for your family, to donate all the cells (if you can and there are only a handful of hospitals that offer donation), or to use Virgin Health Bank's service where you keep some for your family and donate the rest? Virgin's service is substantially cheaper than all the other providers and I know that they have had their cells used in NHS treatments which is a strong indicator of quality.
The third choice is the operational model. Some banks offer to split the stem cells into different sections and store them into different places. Apparently they believe this is safer, well for me its just a marketing gimick if one of my family needed a transplant I would want it to have come from a stem cell unit that had not been split into sections because if there is any variation in the way they have been handled there will be an impact on the transplant unit.
Finally I'd look at the ethics of the organisation i.e. can I trust them?
One bank, Virgin, pledge never to sell to anyone but rather to inform and leave parents to decide and Richard Branson will give profits back to support the growth of these treatments.
Its a matter of personal choice but reading some of the comments above it seems that not all banks tell the whole unvarnished truth in their quest to separate us from our money
A great resource for parents is www.parentsguidecodblood.org...unbiased information which after all is what we all need to make our decisions on.
Naomi