I?m 32 weeks with DC2 at the moment, and am starting to think about whether there are things I?d like to do differently this time round with the birth. To try and be brief: last time the intention was to go to the midwife-led centre attached to our local hospital and try for a drug-free birth. Things ? needless to say! ? didn?t go as planned and I went two weeks overdue, was admitted for an induction, but didn?t get one till three days later (it was over New Year so they were short-staffed). Anyway, I was dilated to the extent that there was no point giving me a pessary (it fell out!), and although I was having contractions they were very very faint and completely irregular. My waters broke themselves but it didn?t start labour properly. A midwife later suggested that they may have broken ?before they were ready? because of all the internal exams I was having (nice!). I then had the full induction drip, epidural, strapped up to monitors etc, and although DD had to be ventoused out when her heartbeat went funny, it was all ok in the end. Not a particularly pleasant experience though, DD was in a lot of pain from the ventouse battle, and still has a little scar on her head 18 months on .
Part of me wonders whether if I had been encouraged to wait longer before going in for the induction, and spent three or four days at home doing useful things like bouncing on a ball, going for long walks and running up and down stairs, instead of moping around the ante-natal ward grumpy and bored, DD would have decided to come out of her own accord. I know that nothing can be said for certain, but I wonder whether the way things went didn?t help. And whether my babies just need/like that bit longer to cook?
So, my question is ? do any of you have experience of asking not to be induced as soon as the two weeks overdue are up? I?d be happy to go to the hospital everyday for the baby to be monitored. How long did they ?let? you go overdue? Do you think it?d be really risky?
Thanks for any thoughts!