Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Spending Challenge website

9 replies

Jaybird37 · 29/06/2010 12:02

Anyone else posting on the Spending Challenge website?

spendingchallenge.hm-treasury.gov.uk/

My painless cuts:

  1. Remove the requirement for two doctors to consent to a termination of pregnancy. A complete waste of time and resources; they never disagree. Plus, it is discriminatory in my view. no man needs 2 doctors to speak to him to consent to any medical procedure.
  1. Stop NHS funding of homeopathy - there is lots of evidence that it does not work any better than placebo, so does not represent good value for money.
  1. Cap pay for senior Council officers. Barnet has just advertised 3 assistant director posts, one at £110K and 2 at £90K. All new posts,to bring in the much criticised easyCouncil idea, which will certainly require secretaries and probably teams under them, plus NI, final salary pensions, etc...
  1. Amend the Finance Act 2010 so you do not have to have a team in the HMRC completely duplicating the work of the Charity Commission before a charity in the UK can receive Gift Aid.

Any other ideas out there?

OP posts:
NetworkGuy · 29/06/2010 15:00

Interesting to see item 3...

I have been meaning for some time to put Freedom of Information requests into councils to determine numbers of staff in each department, upper and lower limits of salaries in each department, total salary cost for each department, total budget for each department, and management structure from Chief Executive down.

While some info has been available for years from city councils in N America, and much of the info is available from Education (part of Local Government back in the 80s and onward) the local Councils are extremely secretive. On Toronto and Chicago web sites, for example, I found e-mail, phone number, potted CVs and head-and-shoulder photos of staff in many departments. Now that really is 'freedom of information' such as would make UK Council staff go white as the blood drains away, I suspect!

While I can quite understand some reluctance to open their books to the public who pay for them, and feel sure the staff at the lower end of the salary scales are needing more, it's the middle and upper end which no doubt keep the locks closed on making management structure and cost out of public scrutiny.

I suspect I would have to submit a number of questions over a number of months to get all those categories answered, because in one go they could claim a fee of over 450 pounds for gathering it and say "pay up or forget it", but the figures should all be relatively easy to find, from the figures needed before a new budget is worked on. They have to have costs for every department, and number of FTE staff (to consider the effect of cuts).

The management reporting is another matter, and there are perhaps a load of well-paid posts based on past amalgamations and reorganisations where back scratching has kept some in posts 'created' for them but essentially unnecessary middle management costing us a lot.

Jaybird37 · 29/06/2010 21:43

These are new posts, not amalgamations. The Tax payers Alliance (right wing organisation which I am not a member of) collates information from advertisements for new jobs and posts regularly.

OP posts:
feedthegoat · 29/06/2010 22:01

Cease payments of winter fuel allowance to people in residential care.

This is paid out specifically to help with fuel bills but if you are in residential care then you have no additional fuel bills and your fee contribution is already assessed based on income.

It may seem like a small thing but probably being paid out to huge numbers of people.

NetworkGuy · 29/06/2010 22:36

Withdraw free parking for council staff using council car parking. Anyone working in a shop or office has to find the cash to pay for parking (or use public transport), so how come council employees get this for free (or much reduced) ?

I'd like to see 80% of governmental / parliamentary jobs moved out of London. How much, one might ask, is paid in "London Weighting" ? Do staff get interest free loans for travel costs if they commute ?

Chil1234 · 29/06/2010 23:11

Pity it's only being offered to public sector workers. People who use public services must surely have views on how costs could be saved?

amicissima · 30/06/2010 15:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Jcee · 30/06/2010 20:21

Chil - it's for public sector workers at the moment then in early July will open to the wider public

Jaybird 37 - I like your ideas...mine is:

Set marketing and PR budgets for Quangos preferably at a vastly reduced level to what they are now.

I work for a quango which spent over £5m on publicising itself and its work which it delivers for and on the behalf of the Govt!

This has included producing marketing leaflets and over the last year establishing a huge marketing and PR dept of over 50 people, which is more than some of the delivery depts (ie the people actually doing the work).

Totally unnecessary as that is on top on whatever our reporting Govt dept spends on their marketing/PR especially when much of it is duplicated or done together for the high profile projects.

As an executive agency, an annual report and some notional budget for generic info leaflets, business cards, website maintenance and the odd event should be enough leaving the Govt Dept to which we report to do all the press releases, facebook and twitter updates etc etc

Jaybird37 · 01/07/2010 06:51

Absolutely agree with you Jcee. That is ridiculous.

OP posts:
NetworkGuy · 22/07/2010 14:51

Just seen on The Straits Times that the public has made so many bizarre comments the site is currently closed down.

I have not been to check, but seeing an idea like cats on treadmills to generate power just made me laugh.

Going back to have a thorough read of the article!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page