Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

My local lib dem MP has replied to my letter...

14 replies

Ninjacat · 19/05/2010 18:50

...Sounds like all Lib Dem voters who complained got the same response.
Thought I'd throw it open to the MN jury. (no mention of my concern over the Cons dodgy "friends" in Europe)

Dear Friend

Coalition Government

Thank you for taking the time to write to me to express your concerns regarding the Liberal Democrats? decision to form a coalition government with the Conservative Party. Please accept my assurances that I fully understand and sympathise with your concerns about this arrangement, however I am confident that this partnership will yield a very positive outcome for the country, and I hope you will allow me this opportunity to explain my reasons for holding this view.

The situation immediately following the General Election on May 6 placed British politics in a very delicate position. No Party achieved the majority of seats required to form a government, which meant that either a coalition would have to be formed or the Conservative Party, as the party with the most seats, would have to attempt to form a minority government. A huge responsibility rested with the Liberal Democrats to either stand by and do nothing or else try to form a coalition with either the Labour or the Conservative Party.

My Liberal Democrat colleagues and I believed that standing idle and enabling the Conservatives to form a minority government would have led to uncontrollable instability in British politics, creating an inefficient and very weak system of government that would struggle to achieve anything or make any progress in tackling the big issues that our country is facing at the moment. What we need right now is a strong and stable government that can implement decisions to start tackling the deficit, reduce the equality gap and reform the political system.

It is for these reasons that my Liberal Democrat colleagues and I felt it right to engage in discussions with both the Labour and Conservative parties. The Liberal Democrat negotiating team sought to ensure that our Party?s key election promises were incorporated, as fully as possible, into the coalition government agreement. These core election pledges were:
fair taxes
a fair start in life for every child
a new approach to the banking system and a greener, more sustainable economy
a new open and fair politics with a more proportional voting system

In the last two weeks I have received thousands of emails and letters from people who feared that entering into negotiations to form a coalition government would mean the Liberal Democrats abandoning the policies outlined in our manifesto. This has certainly not been the case. Instead, our negotiating team stood their ground firmly and insisted that our core pledges be honoured by any Party wishing to form a coalition with us.

My Liberal Democrat colleagues and I were pleased to find that the Conservatives were willing to enter into a co-operative pact in which Liberal Democrat policies, as set out in our manifesto, would be included into a significant proportion of the final agreement. The Conservative Party offered a coalition in which the major Liberal Democrat policies on education, tax, the environment, banking reform, pensions and political reform would all be accommodated.

In order to make a fully informed, responsible decision, my Party also met with Labour. We had hoped that discussions with the Labour negotiating team would also be constructive; however, it became clear that the Labour Party never took the prospect of forming a progressive government with the Liberal Democrats seriously. Key members of Labour's negotiating team gave every impression of wanting the process to fail and made no attempt at all to agree a common approach with the Liberal Democrats on issues such as fairer schools funding for the most deprived pupils and taking those on low incomes out of tax. Certain key Labour cabinet ministers were determined to undermine any agreement by holding out on policy issues and suggesting that Labour would not deliver on proportional representation and might not marshal the votes to secure even the most modest form of electoral reform. I was bitterly disappointed by the attitude of the Labour Party. They ran away from the responsibility of government and the opportunity for a centre-left alliance for reform.

The decision then was clear. The Conservative Party were the only one to be offering a truly co-operative coalition government, whereby Liberal Democrat policies would form a major portion of the Queen?s Speech to the new Parliament (which sets out the government?s legislative aims) and in which Liberal Democrat MPs would be included in the central processes of decision making through the life of this coalition. We now have a unique opportunity to dilute Conservative policies and inject a large part of the Liberal Democrat manifesto into the new government agenda. The alternative: side with an unco-operative Labour Party who offered nothing in terms of progressive, coalition politics or withdraw and allow a weak minority Conservative government to struggle to make any advances in tackling the key issues currently facing Britain.

I hope that this helps to clarify my Party?s reasons for forming a coalition with the Conservative Party. Under this agreement the vast majority of our manifesto promises will be incorporated into the new coalition government pact. Indeed, I have been pleasantly surprised at how accommodating David Cameron and the Conservatives have been.

Of particular concern to many people has been the issue of electoral reform ? an issue which the Liberal Democrats placed at the top of our agenda in our election campaign, and which I assure you remains a key priority for us. For this reason, electoral reform was an immutable clause during our negotiations with the Labour and Conservative parties. As mentioned, the Labour Party were unwilling to make any compromises on this, and many other issues. However, I am glad to say that under the coalition agreement with the Conservatives significant gains have been made in this vital policy area. The parties will bring forward a Referendum Bill on electoral reform, which includes provision for the introduction of the Alternative Vote in the event of a positive result in the referendum, as well as for the creation of fewer and more equal sized constituencies. Both parties will whip their Parliamentary Parties in both Houses to support a simple majority referendum on the Alternative Vote, without prejudice to the positions parties will take during such a referendum. In addition, the parties will bring forward the proposals of the Wright Committee for reform to the House of Commons in full ? starting with the proposed committee for management of programmed business and including government business within its scope by the third year of the Parliament. The parties will also tackle lobbying through introducing a statutory register of lobbyists and we have agreed to pursue a detailed agreement on limiting donations and reforming party funding in order to remove big money from politics. Finally, a fully elected House of Lords, with members elected by a proportional voting system, is also a highly significant part of the agreement.

Yet it is not just political reform in which Liberal Democrat policies are being adopted in this coalition. We have achieved a significant influence across all department areas, including some major changes in Conservative policies to make way for Liberal Democrat ones, including:
No third runway at Heathrow or additional runways at Stanstead or Gatwick;
Taxes per plane rather than per passenger in commercial aviation;
Establishing a high-speed rail network;
Pupil Premium to cut class sizes, invest in schools and provide extra support for children from disadvantaged backgrounds;
Immediately restoring the earnings link for the basic state pension;
Plans to increase the income tax threshold to £10,000 and to curb tax evasion, with tax relief for those on poor and modest incomes taking priority over cuts to inheritance tax;
Introduction of a banking levy on financial transactions;
Introduction of a Freedom Bill;
Scrapping ID Cards, the National Identity register and the next generation of biometric passports;
Increasing the target for renewable energy, helped by establishing a smart grid and the roll-out of smart metres, as well as better administration of feed-in tariffs and energy efficient home improvements.

Liberal Democrat policies will be represented at every level of government in order to give us a voice and keep us involved in all aspects of this coalition government.

As you may know, a coalition agreement has been published, and this clearly speaks for itself in testifying how significant a role Liberal Democrat policies will play in this new coalition government. This document can be viewed online via the following link: tinyurl.com/332kykv

I hope you will take the time to review the agreement and see for yourself how similar much of it is to the original Liberal Democrat election manifesto (which, if you have not previously seen, can be viewed online at www.libdems.org.uk/our_manifesto.aspx).

I now enter into this new session of Parliament with confidence that this - previously unlikely - union will ensure the strong government that this country needs in order to start tackling the big issues that Britain is facing; but moreover, and this is a big ?moreover?, it will be a government in which Liberal Democrat values and promises are upheld as strongly as if we were still speaking from the opposition benches. Please accept my utmost assurances that this development has not clouded my or my colleagues? judgment or principles. We are still the Liberal Democrats and we will still campaign for a fair, progressive politics.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. I hope this response has been helpful to you in clarifying my thoughts and my Party?s position on this matter.

Best wishes
Stephen Williams MP

OP posts:
choufleur · 19/05/2010 18:51

god that's a long letter. sounds like a standard response

Ninjacat · 19/05/2010 18:57

My favourite bit is

"I hope you will take the time to review the agreement and see for yourself how similar much of it is to the original Liberal Democrat election manifesto (which, if you have not previously seen, can be viewed online at www.libdems.org.uk/our_manifesto.aspx)."

I voted for you! Of course I read the Manifesto.

OP posts:
anastaisia · 19/05/2010 19:40

no 'of course' about it Ninjacat - I'd hazard a guess that the majority of people who vote don't read the manifesto.

Why don't you write back and ask the unanswered question again?

bowbluebell · 19/05/2010 19:49

I bloody hope that's a standard response. If not, Stephen Williams has too much time on his hands!

I didn't read the manifesto, although I did have edited highlights read to me in bed, if that counts (oh, the joy of cosy middle age!)

vesela · 19/05/2010 19:53

I think Cameron is probably regretting the decision to pull out of the EPP.

ooojimaflip · 19/05/2010 20:23

TLDNR

Ninjacat · 19/05/2010 20:25

Ooj I felt that when I opened it.

OP posts:
ooojimaflip · 19/05/2010 20:59

;)

pinkteddy · 20/05/2010 14:40

'Certain key Labour cabinet ministers were determined to undermine any agreement by holding out on policy issues and suggesting that Labour would not deliver on proportional representation and might not marshal the votes to secure even the most modest form of electoral reform.'

Labour have denied this. I would love to know the truth. Wonder who the 'certain key cabinet ministers' are?!

vesela · 20/05/2010 17:32

Wasn't it Andy Burnham, in particular? There was someone else as well, but I can't remember who. I remember that various Labour MPs said "I don't think we're going to be able to get this through," and then someone in the cabinet said it and it was a big deal because they were the first minister to say so.

vesela · 20/05/2010 17:33

Ben Bradshaw and Alan Johnson were on the other side, as I remember (i.e. saying it was feasible).

vesela · 20/05/2010 17:36

this is from the Guardian's live blog for 11 May:

? New evidence has emerged about the extent of Labour opposition to a deal with the Lib Dems. Yesterday John Reid ? the former home secretary, but no longer an MP ? was about the only senior figure to speak out against a Labour-Lib Dem pact. Today David Blunkett has said that a deal of that kind would be a mistake. Diana Johnson, a schools minister, has said she does not think a coalition would have the votes to survive. Andy Burnham, the health secretary, has hinted strongly that he agrees, saying: "I think we have got to respect the results of the general election and we can't get away from the fact that Labour didn't win." (See 2.52pm and 3.32pm.)

vesela · 20/05/2010 17:37

and also from the live blog:

3.19pm: Sam Coates from the Times has put this on Twitter:
Against lab-lib coalition at cabinet yesterday - burnham straw byrne khan ainsworth

pinkteddy · 20/05/2010 19:18

Thanks vesela. We now know why Burnham was against it! Reid and Blunkett were just posturing I thought at the time but they obviously still have influence.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page