Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Okay... HUNG parliaments!

5 replies

MarsLady · 30/04/2010 23:09

How hung is hung?

What would happen and how would it work? I don't do politics (but I do vote. Too many people died for me to be able to vote, so I vote).

If I don't come back to this too quickly it's because I'm studying hard.

OP posts:
gingerkirsty · 30/04/2010 23:15

There's a couple of threads on this already here and here HTH

gingerkirsty · 30/04/2010 23:16

PS could also be like a horse....

longfingernails · 30/04/2010 23:19

Total number of seats = 650.

So if one party gets 326 seats or more, they can control all the legislation without relying on the votes of another party.

A hung parliament is where no party gets 326 seats (in practice, a bit less, because Sinn Fein don't take their seat, plus a bit of faffing around with the Speaker etc)

If there is a hung parliament, there are two options: a formal coalition, or a minority government.

A minority government would try to cobble together 326 votes for each piece of legislation on an issue by issue basis. If at any point they couldn't get 326 votes for a Queen's Speech, Budget, or Vote of Confidence then we would have another election.

A coalition is where two or more parties, adding up in total to more than 326 seats, agree a joint programme of government, compromising on various aspects of their own policies to do so.

MarsLady · 30/04/2010 23:25

Thank you longfingernails. Succintly put (which works for me late at night).

Will check out the other threads.

OP posts:
longfingernails · 30/04/2010 23:25

That's the mechanics of hung Parliaments - hopefully completely factual and nothing contentious there!

In terms of whether they are a good idea or not - I think it would be a disaster.

It leads to the smaller parties having a disproportionate say. It leads to instability. No difficult decisions would get made because the other party in a coalition wouldn't agree, for electoral purposes. Everyone is always interested in the short term.

Historically, hung parliaments have almost always been a disaster in this country - and in many (not all, but many) countries round the world.

Not to mention - I instinctively distrust "consensus". If people aren't fighting for what they really believe in, really arguing and scrutinizing, legislation will be far weaker as a result. Consensus is massively overrated in my opinion.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page