Please or to access all these features

Politics

"National Security can't come at the cost of Social Security" - WTAF?

541 replies

Binnyforthewin · 09/09/2026 14:52

Surely our PM releases that without National Security there is no Social Security? One is entirely dependent on the other.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
concertinacornflake · 09/09/2026 20:55

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 20:50

The trouble is AB (as we all know) is stuck in the past. He's still living in Fukuyama's world where history ended. No need to build up your military. The peace dividend can still be spent on welfare. No one will attack us or NATO. The US is a reliable ally that will always come to our aid. Open our doors to the world because everyone has the right to a good life in the UK. Gen X attitude. The world does not contain danger for us. Everything will turn out fine if we just chill.

I'm not going to defend this government's spending choices, but this post is just made up stuff.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 20:55

concertinacornflake · 09/09/2026 20:51

The opinion polls tell you what people feel now. Yes support for Labour is reduced. Burnham himself has a positive approval rating at present.

It doesn't matter why they won the majority - they won it. That's the system.

Youre stating the obvious. But if a government is so paralysed by its PLP that it is unable to take the necessary decisions to keep all of us safe then the country will be ruined. By Labour's inability to make decisions in the national interest rather than for ideological reasons. I don't know what happens then if we are attacked. And Labour bleat " but the housing allowance..!!".

BrandiedAromatics · 09/09/2026 21:00

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 20:55

Youre stating the obvious. But if a government is so paralysed by its PLP that it is unable to take the necessary decisions to keep all of us safe then the country will be ruined. By Labour's inability to make decisions in the national interest rather than for ideological reasons. I don't know what happens then if we are attacked. And Labour bleat " but the housing allowance..!!".

Some of AB's closest associates, Haigh and Midgley, were working on the PLP for over a year to garner support for AB. That is why they have been rewarded with the key positions they have. They are not going to upset the PLP this early.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:03

concertinacornflake · 09/09/2026 20:55

I'm not going to defend this government's spending choices, but this post is just made up stuff.

Why? I think its been a problem for years for politicians of our Gen X generation. If youre brought up in the 90s the world was a very different place. End of the Cold War. Things were hopeful. The USSR was defeated. We could travel nearly everywhere as we weren't enemies any more. No need to worry about defence.

I think it explains the immigration issue too. Because people were relaxed in the 90s overall (obviously not perfect). But we weren't taught that people were defined mainly by the colour of their skin. We were taught it was a person's character that was important. If you're Gen X the 90s taught you to relax about it and not worry about immigration. And we should be tolerant of everything. Live and let live. Obviously the trouble is we had a massive influx of people that haven't assimilated and the country has now changed. But the Gen X attitudes in government haven't caught up to reality.

Just my opinion.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:04

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 19:25

Not true.

They are responsible for the economy being in its current state.

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:09

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:04

They are responsible for the economy being in its current state.

Labour need to stop blaming everyone else. It didn’t work for Starmer either.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:13

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:09

Labour need to stop blaming everyone else. It didn’t work for Starmer either.

It’s the truth. Over a decade of austerity & handouts to rich chums for fake contracts followed by Brexit and Truss’ unfunded mini budget. All on the Tories.

You cannot reverse that much long term damage in 10 years!

The Tory architects of Brexit even bragged that the economic damage of Brexit would last 50 years before we saw their famous uplands and prosperity.

Binnyforthewin · 09/09/2026 21:13

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:04

They are responsible for the economy being in its current state.

We have over two years of Labour fucking it all up now. They need to take some accountability for the choices of Reeves to kill employment. Many of us have been saying for a while that Reeves bet the house on future growth and did everything in her power then to stop the growth. Now we are paying for it in borrowing costs that make would Truss appear like a relative economic expert.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:14

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:13

It’s the truth. Over a decade of austerity & handouts to rich chums for fake contracts followed by Brexit and Truss’ unfunded mini budget. All on the Tories.

You cannot reverse that much long term damage in 10 years!

The Tory architects of Brexit even bragged that the economic damage of Brexit would last 50 years before we saw their famous uplands and prosperity.

Edited

Starmer has already tried this line for two years. It didn’t work.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:16

Binnyforthewin · 09/09/2026 21:13

We have over two years of Labour fucking it all up now. They need to take some accountability for the choices of Reeves to kill employment. Many of us have been saying for a while that Reeves bet the house on future growth and did everything in her power then to stop the growth. Now we are paying for it in borrowing costs that make would Truss appear like a relative economic expert.

Two years is the blink of an eye.
Reeves didn’t kill growth, she stopped the haemorrhage.
The borrowing costs are on the debt that the Tories put us in with the furloughs during lockdown that kept middle class families sitting at home on £2,500/mo per worker. Because UC was not enough for them. While most key workers still had to go to work full time and live on less.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:17

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:13

It’s the truth. Over a decade of austerity & handouts to rich chums for fake contracts followed by Brexit and Truss’ unfunded mini budget. All on the Tories.

You cannot reverse that much long term damage in 10 years!

The Tory architects of Brexit even bragged that the economic damage of Brexit would last 50 years before we saw their famous uplands and prosperity.

Edited

Why is the economy getting worse under Labour?

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:17

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:16

Two years is the blink of an eye.
Reeves didn’t kill growth, she stopped the haemorrhage.
The borrowing costs are on the debt that the Tories put us in with the furloughs during lockdown that kept middle class families sitting at home on £2,500/mo per worker. Because UC was not enough for them. While most key workers still had to go to work full time and live on less.

The NI policy has been terrible for jobs, especially for young people.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:18

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:14

Starmer has already tried this line for two years. It didn’t work.

Not suprised it didn’t work even though it is the truth. People generally don’t understand economics and think it’s like flipping a switch to undo damage. So they will be turkeys voting for Christmas if they vote Tory or Reform.

BananaPeels · 09/09/2026 21:18

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:03

Why? I think its been a problem for years for politicians of our Gen X generation. If youre brought up in the 90s the world was a very different place. End of the Cold War. Things were hopeful. The USSR was defeated. We could travel nearly everywhere as we weren't enemies any more. No need to worry about defence.

I think it explains the immigration issue too. Because people were relaxed in the 90s overall (obviously not perfect). But we weren't taught that people were defined mainly by the colour of their skin. We were taught it was a person's character that was important. If you're Gen X the 90s taught you to relax about it and not worry about immigration. And we should be tolerant of everything. Live and let live. Obviously the trouble is we had a massive influx of people that haven't assimilated and the country has now changed. But the Gen X attitudes in government haven't caught up to reality.

Just my opinion.

Yes j would totally agree. It was a different world. I have no recollection of the word ‘community’ being used unless a local community. Nowadays we are a nation of parallel lives. This community, that community who superficially are integrated but not really. There were more jobs, people expected to get good salaries if they went to uni, there was a large nightlife, people socialised more. I realised recently that the people who were late teens/early 20s between 1996 and 2001 were the last generation to have it really really good. I wasn’t a massive fan of Tony Blair but when was the last time people were that pumped about the future and what the government would do?

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:19

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:18

Not suprised it didn’t work even though it is the truth. People generally don’t understand economics and think it’s like flipping a switch to undo damage. So they will be turkeys voting for Christmas if they vote Tory or Reform.

It’s Labour who stumbled on economics. If you put a jobs tax in place it’ll hammer jobs.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:19

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:17

The NI policy has been terrible for jobs, especially for young people.

No it hasn’t. NI is a scapegoat.
The jobs, especially for the young, were being shed anyway due to Brexit and AI.

BananaPeels · 09/09/2026 21:21

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:19

No it hasn’t. NI is a scapegoat.
The jobs, especially for the young, were being shed anyway due to Brexit and AI.

No 100% disagree on that. I work for a number of small businesses and the Ni increase has been instrumental in the number of redundancies we have made. Reduce it and we’ll hire again. It is cripplingly high for small businesses. This alongside the minimum wage means we used to hire a lot of young people for them to gain experience but we don’t anymore. Not worth it.

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:23

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:19

No it hasn’t. NI is a scapegoat.
The jobs, especially for the young, were being shed anyway due to Brexit and AI.

This isn’t right, Labour are missing the impact because of the lack of insight.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:23

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:19

No it hasn’t. NI is a scapegoat.
The jobs, especially for the young, were being shed anyway due to Brexit and AI.

Rubbish. The ENI rise, the rise in the minimum wage and the day one workers rights has acted as a perfect storm to scupper young people's jobs. Cause and effect and you can see it in the employment figures. A fairly obvious result of Labour's policies to anyone with half a brain living in the real world.

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:24

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:19

It’s Labour who stumbled on economics. If you put a jobs tax in place it’ll hammer jobs.

NI is not a jobs tax. It is a fair contribution for employers towards the costs of social security. A 1.2% increase in NI doesn’t affect the number of jobs. Would a 1.2% increase in the cost of food affect your weekly shop? Not a chance. Businesses just want to keep those record profits going to shareholders and keep labour costs artificially suppressed. Any NI they don’t pay goes to profit and the taxpayer ends up funding the shortfalls in social security.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:25

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:24

NI is not a jobs tax. It is a fair contribution for employers towards the costs of social security. A 1.2% increase in NI doesn’t affect the number of jobs. Would a 1.2% increase in the cost of food affect your weekly shop? Not a chance. Businesses just want to keep those record profits going to shareholders and keep labour costs artificially suppressed. Any NI they don’t pay goes to profit and the taxpayer ends up funding the shortfalls in social security.

This is quite a funny post and clearly from someone who has not employed more than 4 people.

EasternStandard · 09/09/2026 21:25

NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:24

NI is not a jobs tax. It is a fair contribution for employers towards the costs of social security. A 1.2% increase in NI doesn’t affect the number of jobs. Would a 1.2% increase in the cost of food affect your weekly shop? Not a chance. Businesses just want to keep those record profits going to shareholders and keep labour costs artificially suppressed. Any NI they don’t pay goes to profit and the taxpayer ends up funding the shortfalls in social security.

Ok this is the lack of insight re SMEs and jobs.

NotSurprisedReallyNow · 09/09/2026 21:25

I agree with him.

Binnyforthewin · 09/09/2026 21:26

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:23

Rubbish. The ENI rise, the rise in the minimum wage and the day one workers rights has acted as a perfect storm to scupper young people's jobs. Cause and effect and you can see it in the employment figures. A fairly obvious result of Labour's policies to anyone with half a brain living in the real world.

It's just the standard blame everyone else. If Reeves was doing an objectively good job she would still be there. Even the PLP came round to the idea that Starmer and her were a disaster. In the end they couldn't get them out the door fast enough.

OP posts:
NullaEffugium · 09/09/2026 21:27

Pineneedlesincarpet · 09/09/2026 21:23

Rubbish. The ENI rise, the rise in the minimum wage and the day one workers rights has acted as a perfect storm to scupper young people's jobs. Cause and effect and you can see it in the employment figures. A fairly obvious result of Labour's policies to anyone with half a brain living in the real world.

Totally mixed up. Improving workers rights doesn’t scupper jobs.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395008111_Youth_Unemployment_in_Post-Brexit_UK_Evidence_Trends_and_Policy_Implications