Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

MPs to vote on proposed £50 million increase to royal budgets

47 replies

OneBusyFinch · 01/09/2026 19:48

MPs are going to vote on whether to increase royal budgets by £50 million. If you agree they should not be increased, please use this template to generate an email to your MP - the firm will find your MP if you enter your postcode

OP posts:
Moros · Yesterday 09:37

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:18

I'll ask you again.

By whom, and how, do you propose to replace their function of schmoozing foreign leaders both in this country and abroad?

The prime minister.

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 09:55

Imdunfer · Yesterday 09:34

Oh sure, the guy who collects your bins could be president.

Anyone who can get together the funds and/or influence to fight for that role is going to be a very political animal.

Clearly you are not prepared to engage with the debate .

As to the nonsense about ‘anyone with enough money can campaign’ - are you not aware of simple electoral rules around funds for campaigns? It’s normal in countries with a figurehead president. All candidates have the same limits . It’s not complicated.

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 10:02

@Imdunfer

And btw- the Windsors are extremely political !
They spend millions on PR to fool the gullible . They have been shown to interfere in politics , they use the official secrets Act and exclude themselves from FOI as and when to hide whatever they want hidden!
Couldnt be more political

paomara · Yesterday 10:13

I just want to see their wills! Some hidden treasures in there of the inanimate and human variety I'd say!

I read (skimmed over as it was not surprising to me....) that Camilla's sister is/was being paid from the coffers of a charity with Royal connections for PR or something. Yep, I'm sure she needs it as she is on her uppers. Who else on the periphery is benefitting from this kind of largesse?

Anyway, nothing we can do but rage about it all. Parliament needs to take the lead and slowly, slowly catchee monkey. But they won't. Maybe they are hoping for a gong and don't want to upset the sword wielders of the honours list.

dudsville · Yesterday 10:26

Even if it is for repairs and not "funsies" as a pp said, our first concern should be to repairs needed on accomodation for those most in need, not for those who could sell a single jewel from their treasure stores and live handsomly off that for the rest of their lives.

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 10:28

@paomara

Great post.
Your example is just one example of many ‘details’

God knows what’s in the wills but I strongly suspect it would blow the ‘happily married/ example to us all/ head of the church’ image up for good .
One thing it would prove is that the Windsors are rinsing this country for every penny they can take . Philip married in without a penny - died a multimillionare. Same with Albert .

It’s a grift and we are the marks

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 10:31

@paomara

There is change coming re politicans and the monarchy and the first MPs to properly harness the public mood - especially among long term voters ie the young - will reap the benefits .

( does anyone really want a gong from that with what we now know ?)

AFigureWalks · Yesterday 10:45

Thanks, OP, I have just adapted the letter and sent it to my MP.
Greedy bloodsuckers and paedophiles, urgh.

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 10:56

Yes thanks OP

FluentOP · Yesterday 13:38

OneBusyFinch · 01/09/2026 19:48

MPs are going to vote on whether to increase royal budgets by £50 million. If you agree they should not be increased, please use this template to generate an email to your MP - the firm will find your MP if you enter your postcode

Yes, I have contacted my MP. It’s disgraceful to keep giving them money.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 13:53

Moros · Yesterday 09:37

The prime minister.

He has, or should have, too much else to do.

FluentOP · Yesterday 13:53

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 08:24

@Imdunfer

No - re Buckingham palace - it is not part of the crown estate in the usual sense
Look at the detail - some palaces are outside the crown estate and claimed by Charles as a residence and the rules are - of course!- different and benefit the Windsors not us.

They are callled ‘occupied royal palaces’ and the proceeds do not go to the treasury .
Buckingham palace is one of them.

BTW the crown estate and in right of the crown is the same thing. It belongs to us . When the Windsors go - and they will- it will ALL go to the treasury and no skimming off the top for the Windsors

Exactly. The Crown Estate and the Duchies are owned by them as reigning monarch and Prince of wales in “right of the Crown”. THEY ARE NOT THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY. If the royal family cease to exist, the properties revert back to the Nation.

Messedupmyusernameagain · Yesterday 13:58

danglethedingle · 01/09/2026 20:23

I don't think people will care what its for. Everyone is feeling the pinch, and the Royals get given 50 mil to fix their roof. Well lots of people would like the state to pay for vital home improvements, but ordinary people, save up, sell something or get a loan.

This 'Its to repair Buckingham Palace has been going on for years. Why is it given to the RF to spend on repairs? They have clearly spent none of the money given to them over the decades keeping up with the maintenance of their many properties, considering how often they end up in rack and ruin, with repairs funded by us. If they don't intend living in Buckingham Palace, hand it over to Historic Royal Palaces to run and spend the money from ticket sales on maintenance. They can have a private wing for offices, State Banquets etc.Where does the revenue from ticket sales currently go? I read somewhere it was The King- a billionnaire who then puts out the begging bowl to fix the palace and all the residences he shoves his family rent free. The Crown Estates really need to be scrutinised far more severely.

MissBattleaxe · Yesterday 14:00

LoremIpsumCici · 01/09/2026 20:05

It’s to repair Buckingham palace. It’s not for funsies.

No Buck House is going to cost six figures and they only use it for state dinners. It's appalling. Tone deaf doesn't cover it.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 14:00

Ukisgaslit · Yesterday 09:55

Clearly you are not prepared to engage with the debate .

As to the nonsense about ‘anyone with enough money can campaign’ - are you not aware of simple electoral rules around funds for campaigns? It’s normal in countries with a figurehead president. All candidates have the same limits . It’s not complicated.

Clearly you are not prepared to engage with the debate .

😆😆😆

If you think anyone without national level influence will be able to get appointed President you are fooling yourself and if you think influence can be obtained without that person having a lot of money you are doubly fooling yourself.

You're a republican, this is a republican thread, I get it. I don't like the fact their positions and money are inherited either. I was left out of a line up to meet the Queen when I was younger because I refused to curtsey.

I just happen to believe that the institution is worth far more to the country than it costs.

I don't believe the repairs to Buck Palace should be at public expense unless the increased tourism revenues from people paying to see inside when it's no longer lived in, which is supposed to be soon, go to the Treasury.

Messedupmyusernameagain · Yesterday 14:02

OfficiallyOnVacation · 01/09/2026 20:37

The RF is dripping in private wealth and lives extremely privileged lifestyles by an accident of birth. They should feel the squeeze of our country’s financial predicament as much if not more than the general public, as they can afford to cut back more than the rest of us. William only managed 57 public engagements in the first half of 2026 so he’s not as hard working as his parents. Why should he and his entire family get a free pass to live in absolute luxury? It’s totally unfair.

Be fair. William has 3 kids he has to stare at every second of every day, leaving the nannies with nothing to do. Even when they are at school ( boarding school for one) it takes a lot of time to get their tea ready for when they get in and get the car out of the garage to do the school run...

Moros · Yesterday 14:03

Imdunfer · Yesterday 13:53

He has, or should have, too much else to do.

You do know that every single US president from Washington onwards has managed to squeeze this particular requirement into their daily jobs, yes?

Moros · Yesterday 14:05

FluentOP · Yesterday 13:53

Exactly. The Crown Estate and the Duchies are owned by them as reigning monarch and Prince of wales in “right of the Crown”. THEY ARE NOT THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY. If the royal family cease to exist, the properties revert back to the Nation.

OK. Get rid of the royals and have ownership of BH restored back to the nation and the nation should then rightfully pay for repairs. Until then, Charles the Dim can put his hand in his extremely capacious pockets and pay for it himself.

Blummingorgeous · Yesterday 14:08

Why can’t it be funded from the revenue from the King’s Estates of which there are many (all needing upkeep true) but generate a lot of revenue in & of themselves?

FluentOP · Yesterday 14:21

Moros · Yesterday 14:05

OK. Get rid of the royals and have ownership of BH restored back to the nation and the nation should then rightfully pay for repairs. Until then, Charles the Dim can put his hand in his extremely capacious pockets and pay for it himself.

That’s the point, we (the taxpayers) pay for it but don’t get the benefit of it. Norman Baker said that Charlie gets all the proceeds of visitors paying to tour there. It was the same with Windsor Castle when it caught fire. It was their residence until it needed repairing, then it was the taxpayers’ responsibility.

FluentOP · Yesterday 14:23

Messedupmyusernameagain · Yesterday 14:02

Be fair. William has 3 kids he has to stare at every second of every day, leaving the nannies with nothing to do. Even when they are at school ( boarding school for one) it takes a lot of time to get their tea ready for when they get in and get the car out of the garage to do the school run...

🤣🤣

FluentOP · Yesterday 14:51

The royal family are like the mafia. They are exempt from Freedom of Information requests; their wills are kept secret and the late Queen meddled in parliament to exempt her and her family from 160 laws since 1967. MI5 and the royal family knew all about Lord Louis Mountbatten and his connection to Kincora Boys Home but they brushed it under the carpet, just as they have done with Andrew and Epstein.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread