Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Politics

A piece of A.I. for America?

14 replies

MsAmerica · 12/06/2026 21:48

A prominent leftie American senator, Bernie Sanders, wrote a long Op-Ed piece which I thought might be of interest. This is an excerpt.

A.I. Is a Public Resource. You Should Own Half of It.
By Bernie Sanders

The question, then, is not whether A.I. will change the world. It will. The question is: Who will own and control that future? Who will benefit from it, and who will be hurt by it? Will A.I. be used to make life better for working families? Will it enrich our quality of life? Will it help us eliminate poverty, extend life expectancies and solve the climate crisis? Or will the future of humanity be determined by a handful of billionaires who have promoted and developed A.I., with virtually no democratic input, who stand to become even richer and more powerful than they are today?

That is the choice before us.

Let us be clear. Artificial intelligence was not created out of thin air. The data and language used by generative A.I. tools didn’t just pop into Sam Altman’s head or Elon Musk’s imagination. A.I. is built on our collective intelligence: our books, songs, artwork, journalism, computer code, scientific research, videos, conversations, images and ideas spanning generations. That is not just the opinion of Bernie Sanders. According to Mr. Altman, the head of OpenAI, A.I. models were trained on our “collective experience, knowledge” and “learnings of humanity.”

For the most part, tech oligarchs have fed this knowledge into their A.I. models without permission, without acknowledgment, without compensation. In other words, the creative work of millions of people — writers, artists, musicians, journalists, teachers, scientists and ordinary citizens — has essentially been stolen by some of the wealthiest people in the world. It’s time for us to reclaim it.

Since A.I. is built on the collective knowledge of humanity, the wealth it generates must benefit humanity. Not just Mr. Musk, Mr. Altman, Dario Amodei and other moguls whose companies are positioned to dominate the industry. Not just venture capitalists in Silicon Valley or money managers on Wall Street who undoubtedly see A.I. as the next great wealth-extracting machine.

That is why I will soon be introducing the American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act. This legislation would give the public a direct ownership stake in the largest A.I. companies in our country. How? It would create a sovereign wealth fund through a one-time 50 percent tax — not on the profits of OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and other companies, but paid with something far more valuable than that: the stock.

If passed, this legislation would do two crucial things. First, it would give the public a direct role in determining the future of this technology. No longer would the future of A.I. and the transformation of human life that it will bring be dictated by a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The federal government would have the power, through its voting shares and an equal representation on each company’s board, to block decisions that hurt our citizens and to push for policies that help them.

Second, this legislation would guarantee that the trillions of dollars potentially generated by A.I. are used to improve the lives of all of us — not simply to make the richest people in the world even richer. If the big A.I. companies continue to grow as rapidly as many analysts expect, then the value of the sovereign wealth fund will grow as well — and the benefits to the American people will grow along with it.

For the whole Op-Ed:

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/opinion/artificial-intelligence-bernie-sanders.html

https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/the-public-should-own-half-of-the-big-a-i-companies/

OP posts:
logicisall · 13/06/2026 09:29

Excellent post OP.

Lalgarh · 13/06/2026 09:43

Im not quite sure where is the best place to post this, but the market valuation of Musks company as $1Trillion is a sure sign we are in the midst of a bubble and are on the verge of a massive massive financial crash

https://bsky.app/profile/twlldun.bsky.social/post/3mo4rxzwzlk2v

The main problem with Musk being “worth a trillion dollars” is this: imagine his investors or the stock market suddenly realise he doesn’t sell anywhere near enough to justify the valuation. The crash would be huge - so big it would affect all of us. I can’t even hope for him to go bankrupt.

Twlldun (@twlldun.bsky.social)

The main problem with Musk being “worth a trillion dollars” is this: imagine his investors or the stock market suddenly realise he doesn’t sell anywhere near enough to justify the valuation. The crash would be huge - so big it would affect all of us....

https://bsky.app/profile/twlldun.bsky.social/post/3mo4rxzwzlk2v

MsAmerica · 16/06/2026 21:48

Lalgarh · 13/06/2026 09:43

Im not quite sure where is the best place to post this, but the market valuation of Musks company as $1Trillion is a sure sign we are in the midst of a bubble and are on the verge of a massive massive financial crash

https://bsky.app/profile/twlldun.bsky.social/post/3mo4rxzwzlk2v

The main problem with Musk being “worth a trillion dollars” is this: imagine his investors or the stock market suddenly realise he doesn’t sell anywhere near enough to justify the valuation. The crash would be huge - so big it would affect all of us. I can’t even hope for him to go bankrupt.

Thanks - and if I may, I'll point out that the reason you're not sure where to post this is because MN is lacking any forum for Tech or Economics. I keep griping to them about the forum divisions and layout.
The New York Times just had a big piece with a statistical analysis of Musk's projects, showing that most are failed or unrealized.
There is something obscene about his being a trillionaire, no?

OP posts:
Lalgarh · 17/06/2026 00:55

Massive grifting abilities to be sure

logicisall · 17/06/2026 06:15

MsAmerica · 16/06/2026 21:48

Thanks - and if I may, I'll point out that the reason you're not sure where to post this is because MN is lacking any forum for Tech or Economics. I keep griping to them about the forum divisions and layout.
The New York Times just had a big piece with a statistical analysis of Musk's projects, showing that most are failed or unrealized.
There is something obscene about his being a trillionaire, no?

I would support a forum for Business/Economics

logicisall · 17/06/2026 06:21

@MsAmerica can you post an archived link to the NYT article?

GeneralPeter · 17/06/2026 07:05

Worth considering.

mumumental · 17/06/2026 09:56

Excellent

Snugglemonkey · 17/06/2026 10:48

It would be wonderful if it worked.

Lalgarh · 17/06/2026 20:16

logicisall · 17/06/2026 06:21

@MsAmerica can you post an archived link to the NYT article?

This seems to be the most recent NYT article on him (paywalled)

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/12/opinion/elon-musk-spacex-starbase-texas.html

MsAmerica · 17/06/2026 22:58

logicisall · 17/06/2026 06:21

@MsAmerica can you post an archived link to the NYT article?

I'm not sure what you mean. I included a link to the original NYT article, and I don't know of an archive - but the second link is to the article on Bernie's own website. Did you try that?

OP posts:
logicisall · 18/06/2026 10:00

It's the website archive.ph.
When an article is behind a paywall, someone with a subscription can archive a snapshot of the article so anyone can read it. Example below.

https://archive.ph/

Then someone wanting to read the article will C&P the url into the search box to locate it.

MsAmerica · 23/06/2026 01:56

logicisall · 18/06/2026 10:00

It's the website archive.ph.
When an article is behind a paywall, someone with a subscription can archive a snapshot of the article so anyone can read it. Example below.

https://archive.ph/

Then someone wanting to read the article will C&P the url into the search box to locate it.

Ah. Well, I don't have a subscription. I just try to provide enough information so that if someone is really seriously interested, she can try to find a library with a subscription, or she can do a search for another source using my words.

I used to make a point of taking the time to post alternative free sources, but the NY Times seems to have clamped down on that.

OP posts:
Lalgarh · 23/06/2026 09:03

So has the Times

New posts on this thread. Refresh page