You repeated this a zillion times on another thread.
The actual numbers turned out to be about four. Also whilst the report stated alcohol was significant in those cases it did not say how they assessed that significance or what other factors were involved or how the incident were initiated. Any large employer or leisure facility will have cases where “alcohol had been consumed” in complaints even where they don’t serve alcohol on the premises.
There are tens of thousands of people going through the bars and restaurants every year, most of whom are not MPs or Westminster staff. They are also not just “working place” facilities, they are also a secure evening/out of hours leisure facility for MPs and staff who are away from home and may have good reason to avoid public places without security
There are plenty of things to address at Westminster, this is just posturing and I notice she proposed no actual evidence of her claims of drunks supposedly not knowing how to vote (has she not yet grasped the whipping system?) or any better solutions for secure leisure and hospitality facilities. I agree with the PPs suggesting it was clickbait or an MP who knew sod all about the workplace she was entering.