If you’re involved in a trust in any way you know you have to get detailed, specialist tax advice. She was - or so the ethics enquiry found I believe- expressly advised to obtain that specialist advice on more than one occasion, by the solicitors acting for her in the house purchase (since they were not specialists in tax& trusts).
Yet she chose not to do so.
One can only assume this was because she really did not want to find out what the true tax position was.
What other explanation is there?
The enquiry fell over itself to be charitable to her and still found she had breached the Ministerial Code of Ethics (bit of a joke concept really, Ministers and Ethics in the same sentence).
Wilful blindness is not an excuse.
Of course, she’s not alone in politics in being a shameless, unprincipled grifter out for all she can get. She’s been exposed on this occasion for a reason- probably to either promote Wes Streeting, or to cause chaos & increase the likelihood of an early election before the Greens under Polanski & the new party establish themselves- ie to increase Reform’s chances of winning next election. This fact does not make her any less contemptible.