Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Council tax & stamp duty reform

203 replies

PeonyPatch · 19/08/2025 16:15

Who is in favour of this policy?! I think I might be…

Council tax & stamp duty reform
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 07:06

Linenpickle · 19/08/2025 16:22

I saw something that said it would be based on property value. How is that fair if you have a £500k flat in London or a £500k mansion with lake in Scotland….Rachel reeves needs sacking.

But currently someone like me who has a big standard ex council semi in a Northern City can be paying the same as someone with a £1million + property in Westminster… that doesn’t seem fair either so it does need reform it’s garbage right now!!

I see what you’re saying and it shouldn’t go too far the other way there should be some way to means test somehow

Radionowhere · 20/08/2025 07:48

We built our house. How would that work?

Yamyamabroad · 20/08/2025 08:31

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 07:06

But currently someone like me who has a big standard ex council semi in a Northern City can be paying the same as someone with a £1million + property in Westminster… that doesn’t seem fair either so it does need reform it’s garbage right now!!

I see what you’re saying and it shouldn’t go too far the other way there should be some way to means test somehow

That £1million pound flat/studio in Westminster is going to be nowhere near as big as your large ex council house in the North. The person living in it may have have bought it 20 years ago, having scrimped and saved to pay the mortgage. They may have had 2 kids since and still living in the tiny flat. Is it their fault that property prices are so high in London and the South East?

If they go ahead with this, they should work it out on average prices in the local authority area so that someone living the good life on a decent salary in a big house in the North doesn't get a free ride because they live in a cheap area and we're lucky enough to get local jobs

PurpleLeather · 20/08/2025 08:33

Bear in mind, they never change anything to benefit us. They change how they do things to benefit them and to charge more money. There will be no winners other than the treasury if this goes ahead. Yes, council tax is unfair, it charges way too much!! But you can bet the new way of charging will be more. Council Tax should be reduced, not a new tax that will cost more brought in. Taxed on what we earn (42% stolen off us) taxed on what we save, taxed on what we spend, taxed on a house we bought with money we’ve already been taxed on. Get the idea? Reform should be about removing at least half of these punitive taxes that keep a hard-working population paying out most of what they earn to them. Modern slavery.

HostaCentral · 20/08/2025 08:34

So anyone who rents won't contribute to local services? How will that work??

LupaMoonhowl · 20/08/2025 08:45

HostaCentral · 20/08/2025 08:34

So anyone who rents won't contribute to local services? How will that work??

Precisely! So will have even less interest in the LA spending money sensibly. Just another way of Labour gerrymandering the benefits vote.

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 09:00

Yamyamabroad · 20/08/2025 08:31

That £1million pound flat/studio in Westminster is going to be nowhere near as big as your large ex council house in the North. The person living in it may have have bought it 20 years ago, having scrimped and saved to pay the mortgage. They may have had 2 kids since and still living in the tiny flat. Is it their fault that property prices are so high in London and the South East?

If they go ahead with this, they should work it out on average prices in the local authority area so that someone living the good life on a decent salary in a big house in the North doesn't get a free ride because they live in a cheap area and we're lucky enough to get local jobs

Those people exist but are absolutely not the majority. I lived in London a fair few years prior to relocating back up north and worked various customer facing jobs. There are plenty that do have money so I would suggest it’s done on property value but obviously an area that includes somewhere like Kensington would take in ££££ so could increase the existing council tax means tested support that already exists meaning the people you describe would pay a heavily discounted rate and the politicians/celebs/ property tycoons could pay their fair share

TheNoonBell · 20/08/2025 09:08

In theory at 0.44% property value tax I'm going to be over £1500 a year better off!

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 09:09

Radionowhere · 20/08/2025 07:48

We built our house. How would that work?

At some point did the council tax valuer not come round, assign it a rough market value and start you paying council tax?

BurntBroccoli · 20/08/2025 09:31

TheNoonBell · 20/08/2025 09:08

In theory at 0.44% property value tax I'm going to be over £1500 a year better off!

I would be too!

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 09:32

I’ve heard figures of 0.5% been thrown around of property value for the proposed new tax. That’s a huge increase from council tax

It would be pretty much the same for us using Zoopla’s valuation of our house.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 20/08/2025 09:38

Bromptotoo · 19/08/2025 16:16

Council Tax desperately needs reform.

We had a property in Spain and we paid more because we are foreigners fair enough). Our property taxes were less than 300 euros a year and our refuse collection 7 euros every two months.
So how come I need to currently pay just less than 3000 in UK for Council Tax?

LittlePigRobinson · 20/08/2025 09:39

PeonyPatch · 19/08/2025 16:33

Leunig, who authored a 2023 report for the think tank Onward, suggested abolishing council tax and replacing it with an annual property levy linked directly to house value.
Under his model, households would pay 0.44 per cent on the value of their home between £80,000 and £500,000, capped at £2,196 a year, plus 0.54 per cent on the portion above £500,000.
For example, a family in a £650,000 property would pay the maximum £2,196 to their local authority, plus another £810 to the Treasury – a total of £3,006 a year.
Homes worth more than £1m would face an additional 0.81 per cent charge on the value above that threshold.

So, our house is valued at about 650k. If we were to move into an equivalent property we would pay 3k a year instead of stamp duty. If we stayed in that new house for 20 years we would be paying 60k in tax (assuming the figure never increased).

Fortunately we've paid stamp duty on our property already and this new tax only comes into effect when you buy a new property so it wouldn't affect us unless we moved.

This would definitely put me off moving house. The only people I can see this appealing to is those who know they have only a few years left to live. Anyone younger who fancies down sizing will end up paying far more in tax.

Bromptotoo · 20/08/2025 09:51

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 20/08/2025 09:38

We had a property in Spain and we paid more because we are foreigners fair enough). Our property taxes were less than 300 euros a year and our refuse collection 7 euros every two months.
So how come I need to currently pay just less than 3000 in UK for Council Tax?

'cos that's how it works!!

DongDingBell · 20/08/2025 10:00

Are we saying my council tax - over 3000 a year -will be replaced by a % of house value, capped at 2196. So I'll be over 1000 a year better off - house way under 500k.

Sounds brilliant.

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 10:03

Being cynical it’s a great way to stimulate the current sluggish property market. I wonder how many people would rush to move so they pay stamp duty?

Yamyamabroad · 20/08/2025 10:03

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 09:00

Those people exist but are absolutely not the majority. I lived in London a fair few years prior to relocating back up north and worked various customer facing jobs. There are plenty that do have money so I would suggest it’s done on property value but obviously an area that includes somewhere like Kensington would take in ££££ so could increase the existing council tax means tested support that already exists meaning the people you describe would pay a heavily discounted rate and the politicians/celebs/ property tycoons could pay their fair share

I have plenty of friends in less salubrious parts of Haringey who bought their 3 bed mid terrace houses in the 90s, bust a gut to pay for it and now find its worth over a million on paper but they are by no means rich and Wood Green is not glorious. They still need somewhere to live. The same house would be £125k in many parts of the country.

Jamesblonde2 · 20/08/2025 10:23

So do people who rent get services from their council for free?

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 10:35

Yamyamabroad · 20/08/2025 10:03

I have plenty of friends in less salubrious parts of Haringey who bought their 3 bed mid terrace houses in the 90s, bust a gut to pay for it and now find its worth over a million on paper but they are by no means rich and Wood Green is not glorious. They still need somewhere to live. The same house would be £125k in many parts of the country.

That’s fine though and if there was an element of means testing for support they should pay a reduced rate.

Im just saying it ideally should link to value as starting point.
there is currently support but pretty much only for those on benefits whereas in my make believe world it would extend more less all the way up to average uk wage for example.

people like your friends shouldn’t be disadvantaged and it should help people on lower wages in the capital

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 10:36

Jamesblonde2 · 20/08/2025 10:23

So do people who rent get services from their council for free?

What? Why would this be true. It’s linked to the value of the property you’re living in so if I rent a bedsit above a chippy I pay a lower amount if I rent a 5 bed detached with a huge garden I pay £££

TheSummerof25 · 20/08/2025 10:41

Radionowhere · 20/08/2025 07:48

We built our house. How would that work?

It still has a market value?

DeafLeppard · 20/08/2025 10:42

Our house is worth north of £1million and I think this scheme is great. We’ll pay less council tax as the council tax replacement is only on the first £500k, and we won’t pay the SDLT replacement as it wouldn’t be applied to house sales if the owner has already paid SDLT. It’s a great scheme that means that any long term house price rises in the future will have some tax due on them even if they are main residences, and avoids double taxing.

DeafLeppard · 20/08/2025 10:42

Also assets are valued all the time for probate purposes, it’s not difficult.

TheSummerof25 · 20/08/2025 10:42

Jamesblonde2 · 20/08/2025 10:23

So do people who rent get services from their council for free?

The rent would still be proportionate to the value of the property. People don’t pay the same rent for a one bed in Yorkshire as they do a 5 bed in Surrey.

DeafLeppard · 20/08/2025 10:43

Jellybean85 · 20/08/2025 10:36

What? Why would this be true. It’s linked to the value of the property you’re living in so if I rent a bedsit above a chippy I pay a lower amount if I rent a 5 bed detached with a huge garden I pay £££

Landlord will have to pay it, rather than the tenant, and I assume the LL would pass costs onto tenants via rent.

Swipe left for the next trending thread