Trump (Part 6)

[claig]

More on Trump

It is a Trump world and as the Modi saying goes

“Aab Ki Baar Trump Sarkar”

and as the Stump for Trump Sisters say

"Get on the Trump Train or get the hell out of the way"

Rock'n'roll

'Austria?'

Rigged the first time and had to be rerun. I wouldn't be surprised if the elites managed to rig it again.

The left winger Michael Moore explaining why Trump is not elite (because all the elites hate him and are against him) which is why the people like Trump

All the professional journalists to a man got it wrong.

Again, not true.

Clinton's popular vote was entirely from California

What a bizarre thing to claim. Self-evidently, California does not contain 2.8 million more voters than the rest of the US put together.

What I can not get over, leaving aside how much damage can be caused to the world in 4 years, is the fact that you have a man with the apparent impulse control of a 3 year old in charge of pressing the Big Button.

Frankly, I suspect that they'll give him a dummy red button and leave him to play on his own.

Oh, claig, surely you can come up with a better excuse for your filed predictions on Austria than the ridiculous rigging allegation. Even the defeated candidate doesn't suggest that, and he knows a lot more about it than you do.

'Even the defeated candidate doesn't suggest that'

Hofer is a complete puppet, he didn't challenge it the first time it was rigged, it was some people in his party who did.

Well if we're going to discuss interference in elections...

Rigged the first time and had to be rerun. I wouldn't be surprised if the elites managed to rig it again

Oh puuuurleeeeease!

Rig me once, shame on you, rig me twice, more shame on you

Rig me once, shame on you, rig me twice, more shame on you

Proof?

Cask strength, I reckon. We won't have much time.

'Proof?'

The elites don't leave proof lying around. They are "very, very stupid people" but not that stupid. Was there proof of WMDs in Iraq?

How about the Russian intervention into the US election? Does that not count?

Really Claigy, you are fun, but your constant moving of definitions and what the Trump/Brexit vote really undermine your argument.

Doublethink: The acceptance of contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.

'How about the Russian intervention into the US election? Does that not count?'

Trump says it is a lie, the elites say it is real. Who do you believe?

The elites don't leave proof lying around. They are "very, very stupid people" but not that stupid. Was there proof of WMDs in Iraq?

You might want to read that sentence back to yourself.

In fact, if the elites are capable of such worldwide complex conspiracies, why couldn't they get some WMD into Iraq for show? Or just make up some fake news that they had?

How do stupid people manage to create such monumental conspiracies, such as climate change to the point of melting Artic ice just to pretend they're right?

Which whisky shall you choose to go down with?

I'm a Johnnie Walker Green Label girl. You know they discontinued that blend of malts about 4 yrs ago, which means my stash went from c. £23 a bottle to £80, and last week I saw a bottle in a small shop marked as £100.

Fortunately or unfortunately, early this year the firm has started Green Label again.

Trump says it is a lie, the elites say it is real. Who do you believe?

Considering Trump's record and Putin's, I'd say the CIA is on the money.

Dog bites man.

Even Trump said he would accept it if the CIA and FBI wrote him a letter, both have confirmed it.

All the professional journalists to a man got it wrong
Again, not true.

Which one predicted correctly?

Perhaps Lweji, you simply dont understand how things work

Oh, I do.
But if you actually cared to explain how opinions become facts, I'm sure it would be a very interesting post.

You can read to your heart's content about the beginnings of the EU, their original and current goals and all the rest of it. What I have posted earlier is not my opinion, as you seem to be suggesting. Maybe EU's library services are online these days. Check it out.

There were plenty of people who thought it was possible that Trump could win, its not like he didn't have any backing from the media at all, Sean Hannity backed him for one, as did Michael Moore, Fortune said it was unlikely but it could happen, even the Washington Post published articles on Trump winning prior to the election.

Still like with everything else, you are buying the narrative you are given, whilst all the time accusing others of the same thing. Oh the irony.

Journalists? I'm tempted to chant 'Glanderson Booper'

'There were plenty of people who thought it was possible that Trump could win'

Can you name some who said it?

Sean Hannity backed him but didn't predict he would win and Michael Moore never backed Trump, he was a total fake and backed Establishment and Wall Street Hillary above the blue collar workers of Michigan who voted for Trump in the main.