As the UK still has a £100 billion annual budget deficit/overspend, why shouldn't that annual deficit, contributing to an ACCUMULATING National Debt, be allocated and explained to 'the people' - as it is debt accumulated in their, their children,s and possibly their children's children's name - that can only be paid down by a combination of economic growth, higher taxes, and smarter government spending?
www.nationaldebtclock.co.uk/
This Public Sector (unfunded) Pension liability of £1,000,000,000,000 is separate bill payable by the taxpayer, from the National Debt figure of £1.450,000,000,000 above - which (being unfunded) comes out of annual government budgets when due, affecting other government spending options.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14134847
'The people' should understand that in 2015, whether the Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems, Scottish Nationalists, Greens or god help us UKIP parties are the largest partys or in coalitions - government options/extra spending is limited - no matter what political magic dust is promised before hand.
Maybe if in 2010 our national debt wasn't swept under the national carpet by government, and we were able to have an honest debate, for an honest General Election - the voters could have decided who they wanted on the spending/cuts/tax FACTS before them, rather than a denial of the extent of our debt/budget problems back then - and how they'd have done things differently, since.
edamsavestheday ..... I haven't seen the letter yet, or read any analysis, so what is wrong with the Welfare "description", the £££size, or composition?