Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Double Dip Recession

330 replies

Voidka · 25/04/2012 10:05

So if the Tories dont have a Plan B, what are they going to do now? (Not including blaming the last government even though they have been in power themselves for 2 years!)

OP posts:
claig · 06/05/2012 13:22

Those people were puppets of the real elite. The real elite are not on TV screens, they operate behind the curtains and pull the strings of the people on the TV screens.

The capitalist class invests money in order to create goods that help humanity, and sometimes they lose their money due to the risks that they take. In the hope of earning more money, they employ millions of people who all work and learn and grow in the enterprise of making these goods. The wheels of commerce turn and the mass of people earn and teh capitalist who invested in it stands to gain. It is a great system that has brought wealth and innovation and the people who advocate zero growth and even negative growth want to put a spanner in the works.

Yes, some people become too powerful and too greedy, but that is why we must have transparency of ownership and open regulation to prevent anybody cornering the market and preventing free competition.

New Labour's 'light touch regulation' is not adequate for the task; it let the fat cats off the hook.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:23

And in private, the same old machinations continue.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:27

The social elite, the high and the mighty, the snobs in their ivory towers, espying the masses below, have always looked on in disdain at the common people.

They said they were brash, they said they were brazen, and they said they wore bling. But it was through jealousy and the realisation that their time was up - that the masses were on the rise, they were grabbing the prize and nothing could stop them; the bars had been removed from their prison thanks to capitalism.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:30

Ha, ha. Since when were the monarchs of the past not the champions of bling?

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:31

Have you ever looked at the crowns, orbs, sceptres and jewel encrusted clothing of the "great and the good"?

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:33

I know - the monarchs and lords weren't the real elite. It was the awful middle classes.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:35

'Victorian industrialists didn't tend to come from the top public schools - some even rose through the ranks from poor backgrounds'

Exactly. I was talking about centuries before, in the middle ages when there was zero growth and even negative growth.

The Victorian indistrialists and the industrial revolution were part of the capitalist system when the ingenuity of the masses, the industriousness of the workers, and the capital of the capitalist changed the face of the planet. As the people's wealth rose, some of the nobles' estates closed, privilege was in decline and all in the land was fine.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:36

The monarchs don't call their crowns bling. They say that bling is what the council estate kid wears.

minimathsmouse · 06/05/2012 13:36

Yes the same little people that are paying the price for the recent crash. The same little people that are invited to join the celebration and the rejoicing when the stock markets climb but have no real reward when it does.

Capitalism requires a compound 3% growth rate as I pointed out before. To achieve this the elite must invest to the tune of $3 trillion (by today's standard) it isn't possible or even desirable unless you believe that capitals race to invest and acquire should lead to a Mcdonalds in every tribal village in Africa and the complete deforestation of south America. If you take that to mean I am one of your elite, so be it Confused but the fact is that Capitalism is destroying nature, it has subjugated human nature and now it packages it up in wind turbines, unmet social/welfare needs and sells it back to us at a profit.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:42

'Yes the same little people that are paying the price for the recent crash. The same little people that are invited to join the celebration and the rejoicing when the stock markets climb but have no real reward when it does.'

You are right. The austerity is the revenge of the elite. It is the return of the elite with their green Trojan horse offering the gifts of zero growth and even negative growth. If only Thatcher were back, oh how we need the return of the Mummy!

claig · 06/05/2012 13:44

'If you take that to mean I am one of your elite, so be it'

mini you are not the elite, but I fear that the elite may have done their work on you and sold you a pup as they so often do.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:46

Block up your ears and sign a loud tune just as Odysseus once did, when the elite were trying to sell him a pup too.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:49

When you hear sustainability, climate catastrophe and other songs that the elite sing, remember valiant Osysseus and remember that all dangers must pass.

claig · 06/05/2012 13:50

Zero growth deserves zero votes

minimathsmouse · 06/05/2012 13:51

"The Victorian indistrialists and the industrial revolution were part of the capitalist system when the ingenuity of the masses, the industriousness of the workers" I give up at this point claig, you really need to read Engles and come back again. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/condition-working-class/ch03.htm

"Manufacture, on a small scale, created the middle-class; on a large scale, it created the working-class, and raised the elect of the middle-class to the throne, but only to overthrow them the more surely when the time comes. Meanwhile, it is an undenied and easily explained fact that the numerous petty middle-class of the "good old times" has been annihilated by manufacture, and resolved into rich capitalists on the one hand and poor workers on the other"

"Since capital, the direct or indirect control of the means of subsistence and production, is the weapon with which this social warfare is carried on, it is clear that all the disadvantages of such a state must fall upon the poor. For him no man has the slightest concern. Cast into the whirlpool, he must struggle through as well as he can. If he is so happy as to find work, i.e., if the bourgeoisie does him the favour to enrich itself by means of him, wages await him which scarcely suffice to keep body and soul together"

and that is the way it remains to this day the working man must sell his labour and it is at the whim of his master whether he should work 5 hours or 50, eat bread or have ham in his sandwhiches.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:57

Thomas Cromwell was, apparently, the son of a blacksmith, fuller, cloth merchant and owner of both a hostelry and a brewery. Clearly a good business background. He became first Earl of Essex. He didn't start out posh. Merchants of the past didn't have to start out posh to be successful, provided they tried to join the elite, rather than beat them - somewhat like now. The first Duke of Marlborough started out as a page boy (male servant in the royal household). Nicely placed, but really not posh to be a servant. The aristocracy has never been averse to letting in a few clever, manipulative, business-minded, war mongering people to join its ranks, if they are willing to try hard enough - it was, after all, from amongst those ranks that the aristocracy first started out. Then the age-old desire to benefit your children and hold onto your wealth and power for eternity got in. Philip Green is no more immune to that than anyone else. He has joined the elite. He is not one of "us."

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 13:59

In fact, the aristocracy was always at the mercy of the merchants and business people. Banking was not invented in the industrial revolution. Nor was trade.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 14:00

The real power behind the throne was always who had the money and who was best at keeping hold of it.

minimathsmouse · 06/05/2012 14:01

"mini you are not the elite, but I fear that the elite may have done their work on you" but how do you know? might it be that the conspiracy theorists have had a whale of a time on you? we might never know.

However are we now at a crossroads where several different spheres of material fact and conceptual reasoning will bring about another great change. Life is not static and human development dictates we move forwards, this will not lead to feudalism but we have to ask ourselves if after 600 years of capitalism has it eradicated poverty, destitution and starving? Has it led to huge inequalities and even greater damage to the environment? what could replace it?

claig · 06/05/2012 14:04

The communists are tools of the elite. The communists' main enemy is the bourgeois - the dreaded reader of that fine organ, the Daily Mail - even more than the capitalist, and the aristocracy's main enemy is the bourgeois - the uppity aspirant to social mobility.

They both want to prevent the bourgeois rising, prospering and progressing. They both want to remove the middle, the bourgeois, which is why they both 'squeeze' the middle.

They both want a two class system with a proletariat and an aristocracy or ruling elite. The communists carry out the objective of stopping the bourgeois for their aristocratic paymasters.

claig · 06/05/2012 14:05

rabbitstew, you make some good points - there were one or two exceptions.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 14:08

You think Philip Green came from a bourgeois background now, do you, claig? Or that he became bourgeois? Nothing seems to be stopping him from progressing and supporting policies that squeeze the middle, now.

rabbitstew · 06/05/2012 14:09

And there are one or two exceptions, now. One or two isn't very much, is it? Not much different from previous centuries, except you no longer need the title to keep the wealth in your family.

claig · 06/05/2012 14:10

And the capitalist is just the same old merchant and trader and commercial entrepreneur whom the aristocrats despised back in Ancient Greece as well as medieval Britain. That is why teh communists' second enemy - after the bourgeois Daily Mail subscriber - is the capitalist, for that is what their aristocratic paymasters wish.

minimathsmouse · 06/05/2012 14:11

Mayer Amschel Rothschild a money changer who had traded with the Prince of Hesse and went on to lend money to the british monarchy and the British nobility. In fact they liked the Upstart money man so much several members of the family have now been made nobility including being given hereditary baronies of the Habsburg Empire.

Never again was the little guy from the ghetto ever one of us, in fact his family become this elite that Claig talks about.