Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Forget pasties and petrol: Osborne is the Coalition’s real Achilles Heel

8 replies

ttosca · 02/04/2012 09:20

In the aftermath of Osborne?s Budget ? with grannytax, pastygate and petrol panic dominating the headlines ? one key issue seems to have been forgotten: jobs and growth.

Labour party and lefties shouldn?t get giddy over polls showing people think the Tories are ?out of touch?: unfortunately they?ll tolerate ?out of touch? as long as they think Tories are setting the economy on a path to recovery. They?ll forget Grannytax soon enough.

But the economy is in fact the government?s biggest Achilles Heel. They?re only getting away with it because Labour doesn?t have laser-like focus.

There were two key developments in the Budget.

First, the Office for Budget Responsibility admitted Osborne?s budget would make negligible difference to UK?s economic growth. In other words, the Tories have given up trying the ?most pro-growth budget ever? rhetoric.

They?ve given up on growth. Osborne knows we?re heading for another year of economic stagnation, and no one has bothered to pull him up on it. All those big growth initiatives came to jot. Zilch. Nada. So much for the ?expansionary fiscal contraction? revolution they were going to unleash.

And then there was the long-term outlook ? at which point the Libdems should be really worried (they?re the ones facing an existential crisis, not the Tories).

Osborne?s growth projections until 2016 are also likely to fail.

How do I know this? Over the last year, most of UK?s growth predicted by Osborne was meant to come from increased business investment. In 2011 business investment was meant to soar by 8.1%. By 2012 this was meant to jump to 10%. In fact, over 2011, business investment actually fell by 2.0%.

But it gets worse! Osborne has (unsurprisingly) reduced projections for growth in business investment going forward. What is that replaced with? Erm, consumer spending.

That?s right. Even though wages are falling and the government is cutting more jobs and spending ? Osborne predicts that consumer spending will miraculously keep the British economy afloat.

As Duncan Weldon points out here:

In fact private consumption will now drive over 50% of all GDP growth in the period to 2016. The household savings ratio (the percentage of their income that households save) is forecasted to fall every year from 2012 until 2016. By the second quarter of 2014 the household sector is expected to become a net borrower from the rest of the economy. This all seems suspiciously like the growth before the crash that Osborne explicitly set out to avoid.

Just to be clear: Osborne expects that households will increase their borrowing to spend money, just so the economy can limp on at a slow rate.

Anyone see the problem here? To summarise: the Tories are going to fail at their singular objective ? growing the British economy. As a result of that, they?ll also have problems cutting the deficit.

If I were a Libdem or a backbench Tory MP, I?d start agitating for some fresh thinking. Osborne is out of ideas and he?s going to lead the government off a cliff.

liberalconspiracy.org/2012/04/02/forget-pasties-and-petrol-osborne-is-the-coalitions-real-achilles-heel/

OP posts:
minimathsmouse · 02/04/2012 09:58

What do we expect when we have someone with a 2:1 in History and a career in folding towels who has not even the faintest idea of economic theory.

CogitoErgoSometimes · 02/04/2012 12:07

This is true... but since the alternative is Balls, a privately educated man with a first in Economics from Oxford, who was one of the chief advisors in the hot seat when the shit hit the fan in 2008... is academic economic theory all it's cracked up to be?

minimathsmouse · 02/04/2012 12:34

Not when we consider that the economics of Adam Smith is being taught as absolute fact. Cogito I agree, I don't think Balls and labour have the answers.

Although it might do the torries some good if they consider who is available to them. Even if that meant replacing Osborne with a lib dem when they next play musical chairs.

CogitoErgoSometimes · 02/04/2012 13:05

I don't think anyone has the answers. All bets were off in 2008 and a lot of received wisdom on economic behaviour (Adam Smith included) had to be abandoned. Not just in the UK but also internationally. I think everyone is feeling their way at the moment and the people I am most suspicious of are not the ones in power having to make decisions, right or wrong, but those on the sidelines fooling the electorate into believing it's all very simple, using phrases like 'too far too fast' & knowing full well their ideas have no better chance of success.

JuliaScurr · 02/04/2012 13:12

Bloody hell, minimaths, I've got a 2:1 in History and a career in folding paper! I could apply! Gizzajob, Dave?

minimathsmouse · 02/04/2012 13:49

Julia you should volunteer, rather you than me Grin

Thing is Cogito, are the rest of world looking at George and wondering what the hell he is up to. Are they waiting to see if the shop boy from selfridges has hit upon some brilliant new theory. No I suspect that those in the know are aware that these swinging cuts are unavoidable unless we want to have them imposed through the IMF.

Rather cook our own goose than have foreigners do it for us! I'm starting to think that the ConDems probably have no choice. Thing is we as people do have choice, I'd hate to think we will only excersie that when we end up like Greece.

breadandbutterfly · 02/04/2012 20:44

Great OP.

Nothing wrong in 2.1s from Oxford in History - I have one myself. Then again, I don't pretend to be an economic expert.

Of course there are alternatives. For a start, I'd make sure any tax cuts cut tax from those likely to spend it in the real economy, not save it in Monaco.

JuliaScurr · 03/04/2012 17:13

www.pcs.org.uk/en/campaigns/campaign-resources/there-is-an-alternative-the-case-against-cuts-in-public-spending.cfm

Here's an alternative
But I think Boy Gideon won't like it

New posts on this thread. Refresh page