Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

25k for access to Nick Clegg

16 replies

LilyBolero · 18/04/2011 14:13

Can't believe cash for access is still going on tbh. So corrupt.
Clegg's Club for the rich

OP posts:
ttosca · 18/04/2011 15:46

Disgusting and predictable. We are governed by a plutocracy, not a democracy.

Fauve · 18/04/2011 15:53

SpinWatch (quoted) sounds like a useful kind of organisation - anyone know any more about them?

GabbyLoggon · 18/04/2011 16:01

Access should not be available to government ministers for cash. They should vote like the rest of us

LilyBolero · 18/04/2011 16:04

It must be Clegg's 'new type of politics'. Ironic that he makes such a fuss about internships, but is quite happy for the rich to buy influence.

OP posts:
HHLimbo · 18/04/2011 16:08

I met and talked to Nick Clegg for free thanks.

And iirc he still tours the country meeting everyone/anyone for free.

Sounds like spin to me.

LilyBolero · 18/04/2011 16:24

But if that was the case, why would anyone join this club?

I can't get access to Nick Clegg. I would certainly have some things to say to him, but I can't meet him to say them. If I had 25k, then I would be able to.

OP posts:
edam · 18/04/2011 16:31

I suspect this isn't confined to the Lib Dems. IIRC the Tories have various clubs you can join and the more you pay, the better the access. And I imagine Labour do something similar (although possibly less overt).

Not Right At All. Probably explains why they are so cowardly towards the banks and big business.

edam · 18/04/2011 16:33

Mind you, you'd have to question the judgment of anyone who thinks it's worth spending £25k to see Nick Clegg, FFS. Grin

LilyBolero · 18/04/2011 16:35

It's not right whichever party does it.

OP posts:
Fauve · 18/04/2011 18:07

Yeah, madness, edam. Chuck it my way, I'm influential. Grin

Chil1234 · 18/04/2011 21:14

I suppose at least it's up front. Every party relies on financial contributors and there's this peculiar idea that the contributions should be made in a semi-altruistic fashion.... no rewards expected beyond the warm glow of being on the side of righteousness. At least this scheme is saying what your £25k will get you. I'm more concerned about sponsors that bypass schemes, send a far bigger cheque and get to meet the team on a less formal basis.

newwave · 18/04/2011 22:09

AS much as I find it distasteful I am far more worried about Murdoch and his toxic influence, worse still he is not even a UK citizen.

NoTimeLikeThePresent · 19/04/2011 05:40

A waste of 25k imo

GabbyLoggon · 19/04/2011 18:04

It would be business who would pay the 25K

(big business will always sign up ex Ministers.)

we are a GREEDY country at the top. I suppose excessive pots of dosh are a sort of addiction

Another thin the RICH never admit there rich They say comfortable and drive off in a Roller. Cameron says it, HMQ probably say it privately....

A well known Rugby international says it all the time

I suppose there can be tax considerations for what the rich say publicly

Mellowfruitfulness · 19/04/2011 20:07

Don't like this at all.

Agree with Chil: 'I'm more concerned about sponsors that bypass schemes, send a far bigger cheque and get to meet the team on a less formal basis'.

Imagine a democracy that didn't rely on bribes 'sponsors'. Imagine each political party got the same amount of money from the tax payers and wasn't allowed a single penny more from anyone else ... I know this has been suggested before, but it would really clean up politics, wouldn't it?

edam · 19/04/2011 22:59

Hello Gabby, how's Mrs Gabby? Sorry to interrupt this thread but have been wondering and can't find the original thread. Hope you got good news.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread