Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Nice or not so nice call me Dave

5 replies

newwave · 10/04/2011 00:10

C&P

David Cameron: What the experts say
By Brian Reade 4/02/2010
Few financial journalists in Britain are held in higher esteem than Jeff Randall.
He has been business editor of virtually every heavy newspaper, was the first journalist to be given that title by the BBC and now has his own peak-time show on Sky.
In a peerless career, he has been showered with awards for his honesty, integrity and grasp of City matters.
In the late 1990s, as editor of Sunday Business, he had many dealings with the head of communications at Carlton TV, David Cameron.
And this is what he wrote when he became Conservative party leader in 2005: "I wouldn't trust him with my daughter's pocket money.
"In my experience, he never gave a straight answer when dissemblance was a plausible alternative.
"Whether he flat-out lied I won't say, but he went a long way to leave me with the impression that the story was wrong. He put up so much verbal tracker you started to lose your own guidance system."
Randall was not alone among business journalists in holding Cameron in utter contempt throughout his seven-year stint at Carlton. Like him, some pull up just short of calling him a professional liar.
Chris Blackhurst, City editor of the London Evening Standard says Cameron was "aggressive, sharp-tongued, often condescending and patronising.
"If anyone had told me then he might become Premier I would have told them to seek help."
Patrick Hosking, investment editor of The Times, said: "He was obstructive."
Most damning of all is this assessment by veteran City journalist Ian King, who calls him "a poisonous, slippery individual," adding: "He was a smarmy bully who regularly threatened journalists. He loved humiliating people, including a colleague at ITV he would abuse publicly as 'Bunter', just because the poor bloke was a few pounds overweight.
"He was a mouthpiece for that company's charmless chairman, Michael Green, who operated him the way Keith Harris works Orville."

OP posts:
glasnost · 10/04/2011 09:33

Who cares whether he's nice or not? The fact he's a radically right wing toff waging class war on the less well off is the point.

breadandbutterfly · 11/04/2011 18:35

again - newwave - you really should quote your sources asnd I'm not clear why you don't. I read this in the comments' page of the Guardian yesterday and I bet you did too.

newwave · 11/04/2011 21:58

B&B

You may notice that I usually always head my C&P with C&P at the top of a post, my apologies to the "author" in this case.

That said every word of it is correct

OP posts:
Chil1234 · 13/04/2011 03:46

And the point being .... ? That Cameron is not some cheesy toff, all wet behind the ears and the picture of innocence but a bit of a player with sharp elbows & a good line in duplicity and bullying? This is news? In my experience, honest, gullible guys rarely make it to the top in any organisation, but neither do people with nothing going on between the ears. Besides which, who is going to take lessons in integrity from members of the jounalism profession...? "Mr Pot, meet Mr Kettle" I think

GabbyLoggon · 18/04/2011 16:42

I think the slick salesmanship should be ignored.

Camerooney will be remebered for his policies. Not his 2 grand suits.

Commentators seem to think he is Thatcherite in some policies and
not in others.

Libya will be filling his thoughts at the moment; not you and I

Timing of military action seem to alway be an underestime.

Some daft geezer said the 2nd world war would be over by Christmas (He meant 4 months) It lasted 6 years.

I think you need to be a realist in politics not a fluffy professional optimist.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread