There's a lot about it on: NHS reforms- anyone else as disbelieving as I am.
Basically the NHS is being broken up. So instead of integrated, coherent large Primary Care Trusts and Health Authorities, there will be lots of little consortia of GP surgeries, behaving like little competing businesses. These will then put work (ie patients) out to hospitals, also little competing businesses (iiuc).
The GPs will then have to do the admin work that is currently done by professional administrators (most of them much cheaper than a GP). Of course very few GPs will do this, but that's OK because there are big private companies which will offer to do it all for them. This change is about "creating opportunities for private enterprise" within taxpayer-funded services - ie diverting taxpayers' money into shareholders' profits.
There are many questions about this:
? how will fragmentation affect continuity of care?
? who will do coherent large-scale public health planning?
? who has accountability when something goes medically wrong or a patient falls between fragmented stools?
? what happens when a private admin company effects client capture, and is so deeply involved that the consortium supposedly employing it can no longer simply sack it?
? how will GP consortia negotiate favourable prices with drug companies, as NICE and big local authorities/trusts can do?
? and lastly, why on earth would you bother with this expensive restructuring unless the ultimate aim is privatisation?
Fragmentation is a pre-requisite for privatisation because the NHS is too big to sell as a whole and it's politically unacceptable. So instead you fragment the NHS and tell people service won't change; outsource fragments and tell people service won't change; change payment from taxation to pay-per-use and tell people it won't affect the poorest; etc etc
More info and Unison campaign here