The piece is bilge and what he says isn't interesting or original.
There have always been people who are socially liberal and economically conservative. Big deal.
The Dutch guy he's writing about seems to be socially liberal, economically conservative and foamingly anti-Islamic. Big deal x 2.
You're only at the mercy of idiots in the media (like the author of this piece) if you stop thinking for yourself.
And now I think of it, the heterodoxy of Pym Fortuyn's views was widely covered in the media at the time, so the notion that he was crudely represented as simply "far right" isn't even true.