Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Philosophy/religion

Join our Philosophy forum to discuss religion and spirituality.

what Bible and where to buy

12 replies

gio71 · 16/02/2008 08:34

Hi, I am looking to buy a Bible, it's been so many years since I had one that I am looking recommendations of what edition to buy. I am looking for a Catholic bible, something in modern language (but I dont want anything with updated gender language, am quite happy with the references to Man of my childhood). Can anyone help me? Ideally with a link of where I can buy online with international delivery?
Thanks so much

OP posts:
SueBaroo · 16/02/2008 12:19

The Jerusalem Bible?

ScienceTeacher · 16/02/2008 12:36

or New Jerusalem

MaryBS · 17/02/2008 09:14

I would also vote for the New Jerusalem. The NRSV do a "Catholic" version, but it uses inclusive language eg "Brothers and Sisters" where the Greek says "Brothers".

TallDaddy · 17/02/2008 09:31

I am new to this religion lark having been baptised last easter.....I didn't know that there was a different bible for catholics...

I have the Good News, NIV and another one which escapes me at the moment....what are the differences between these and the Catholic one?

MaryBS · 17/02/2008 13:22

It can be a bit of a contentious issue, but this is a description which I found which is fairly balanced and non-emotionally charged(!):

The Apocrypha refer to texts which are left out of officially sanctioned versions ('canon') of the Bible. The term means 'things hidden away,' which implies secret or esoteric literature. However, none of these texts were ever considered secret.

In some Protestant Bibles, they are placed between the New and Old Testament. In the Roman Catholic Bibles the books are interspersed with the rest of the text. In this case they are also called 'Deuterocanonical', which means 'secondary canon.'

Jerome rejected the Deuterocanonical books when he was translating the Bible into Latin circa 450 CE. This was because no Hebrew version of these texts could be found, even though they were present in the Greek Old Testament (the Septuagint). However, they eventually were accepted by the Church, and most of them remained part of the Bible. Protestants rejected these books during the Reformation as lacking divine authority. They either excised them completely or placed them in a third section of the Bible. The Roman Catholic Council of Trent, on the other hand, declared in 1546 that the Deuterocanonical books were indeed divine.

Of these books, Tobias, Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, Baruch, and Maccabees, remain in the Catholic Bible. First Esdras, Second Esdras, Epistle of Jeremiah, Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, Prayer of Manasseh, Prayer of Azariah, and Laodiceans are not today considered part of the Catholic apocrypha.

With one exception, all of these books are considered 'Old Testament'. The apocryphal New Testament 'Letter of Paul to the Laodiceans', was once incorporated in many versions of the Bible. However Laodiceans is now considered just a pastiche of other Epistles, and is omitted from contemporary Bibles.

There are many other apocryphal books, which do not fall into the 'Deuterocanonical' category, such as the many additional New Testament Gospels, and the apocalyptic book of Enoch. Some of these can be found in the Apocrypha section.

MaryBS · 17/02/2008 13:28

And if you don't want to read all that , the Catholic bible contains the "extra" deuterocanonical books of the bible. If you buy a bible "with Apocrypha", it takes the deuterocanonical books out of their place in the Catholic bible and puts them in its own section, generally between old and new testaments.

TallDaddy · 17/02/2008 13:39

Thank you MaryBS....that makes more sense now.

Trolleydolly71 · 18/02/2008 21:24

Message withdrawn

MaryBS · 19/02/2008 21:34

Not sure what point you're trying to make TD, but I've said a prayer for you

Anyone who has done any serious bible study, particularly the OT, is aware of the inconsistencies and many of the reasons behind it.

SueBaroo · 19/02/2008 21:45

Agreed MaryBS. Someone like Henry Morris would be a good read (after someone has read Sam Harris's book, of course ) for balance.

I'm always mildly amused by atheists thinking that Christians have never come across any of these objections and queries.

Trolleydolly71 · 19/02/2008 21:47

Message withdrawn

violetdisregard · 19/02/2008 21:51

I'd also add that the Reader's Edition of The New Jerusalem Bible or the Study version are both good.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page