Yes possibly, but the church has changed dramatically visually and I feel it has lost its beautiful atmosphere along with it.
It really does feel like a recording studio of something, not a church.
But what should a church look like?
The first churches looked nothing like church as we know it. They met in homes around a common table, and grew massively because of that. It's only over the centuries since that we have imposed this look on churches and idealised it. It's more of a nostalgia thing than what a church should actually be, and it's a shame if it does make things more inaccessible for people.
We have pews in our church, but what we are doing is getting rid of the first three rows to get comfortable chairs, so that those who feel uncomfortable in the pews are welcomed, and much more accessible for those using wheelchairs too. But we can't replace the lot because our church is big and if we had chairs we wouldn't fit everyone in - the pews do mean people can budge up a bit, especially at Christmas when it's rammed. So we're trying to be practical about both. Having the first rows chairs does mean the space will be much more flexible, we'll be able to change the pattern etc for smaller services, or move them altogether for various events. I think it will work really well. I'm looking forward to them personally because I'm chronically ill and find the pews make me so uncomfortable and in more pain.
Ultimately church is about so much more than the aesthetics. I personally think sometimes the buildings just get in the way...
Cathedrals don't tend to have pews, and yet they don't lose any beauty for it...