have you done so using an atheist apologetics website to warp shape your viewpoint?
Actually I tried something novel. I read the actual words What's more when I first began my study the internet had not been invented and nor had personal computers.
I gave you a few examples out of 1000s. You can read the book yourself if you doubt that they are there.
It's 'old and boring' because it's true and because Christians don't like people knowing about it. It's really bad for business.
So you are supporting saying there's nothing wrong with mauling young men if they say something you don't like. You prove my point regardless of how serious the injuries were. If you pushed a young man (or child) into the bear enclosure at the zoo you would defend it as "something that Jesus would do" right? Remember to mention that if asked to babysit.
You say that people can survive bear attacks because you know how awful that sounds and because you can't defend it in any straightforward way. In fact they can survive, but you don't know that until afterwards so it would be called attempted murder by today's laws.
Of course they don't normally attack humans in packs in real life. The guy who wrote that part of the bible was indulging in wishful thinking. It's what he wanted to happen.
Banging on about special privileges is hypocritical don't you think?
I'm saying you should have to obey the law even if god whispers in your ear that maiming some people is a good idea or cutting some bits off of some children.
The special privileges are the ones enjoyed by the members of religious cults. All we want is equality under the law.
You should be aware of the special right for bishops to sit in the house of lords to help pass Christian biased laws. That's in addition to any that might just happen to be Christian in case you misunderstand the situation.
You must surely be aware of the demands of the churches for the right to discriminate. We pass laws about equality and the churches say "no! we don't want to treat all people decently"