I hope it's ok to post here, I haven't before (and apologies in advance for interrupting, if it's not).
A little bit of background. I was raised as a Roman Catholic: RC schools, mass each week, was actually quite devout, but cripplingly shy and never got involved with church "youth" or groups at Uni etc. Grew lazy re attending church in 20s, and faith slipped into a back-of-mind thing, but started again with birth of DCs. Now (mostly) happily attending lovely local CofE church, which is an occasionally uneasy mix of Anglican old-school and more evangelical.
Before I say anything else, I should say that re-finding my faith, and coming back to Christianity as an adult, is something I feel as a real blessing, and for which I give thanks every day. I will try to word this post as sensitively as I can; I genuinely don't want to be combatative or offensive, and I apologise profoundly if anyone feels that I am.
So: prayer. When I first started attending my "new" church, I went on the Alpha course. I generally found it interesting and helpful, but one thing Nicky Gumbel said really sat uneasily with me; namely that he kept a "prayer diary", and marked off those of his prayers which he felt had been answered. I did try to raise some of my unease in the discussion afterwards, but felt that the course leaders thought I was attacking the notion of prayer itself, so I quickly piped down.
Our church has also recently introduced prayer sessions after Communion for those who want to pray with/be prayed for by members of the congregation. The vicar introduced these as the chance to pray with people who "know what they're doing", and again, I just find this uncomfortable.
I am really struggling with this. I pray regularly, but my prayers are usually more concerned with giving thanks, asking for help to live my life as God wills it, and asking for strength to be granted to those in difficulty. It's not that I doubt that God can or will answer prayers, more that I can't reconcile my concept of an infinitely loving God with this idea that - effectively - some prayers are better than others.
I suppose, too, if I'm very honest (and this is the bit which I hope doesn't offend), I find it hard to comprehend the notion of prayer as a kind of critical mass: that God might grant prayers to heal someone, if a large number of people have prayed for that, while another person in the same position but who had no-one to pray for them wouldn't recover.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can better understand these aspects of prayer? As my DCs get older and I try to help them learn to pray meaningfully, I can see this issue becoming more difficult, and I really don't want it to become a sticking point for me feeling comfortable about being a member of my church.
Any ideas or insights would be very gratefully received, thank you.