Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Petitions and activism

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Sign if you agree. Why has there been no Met investigation into the 'party'?

18 replies

SoTiredNeedHoliday · 08/12/2021 15:54

Its a disgrace that there has been no official investigation. Please sign the petition if you agree.

www.change.org/p/iopc-policeconduct-investigate-the-metropolitan-police-for-allowing-the-2020-downing-street-party

OP posts:
ssd · 08/12/2021 16:04

Dunno why, maybe some high heid yins were there?

TeenMinusTests · 08/12/2021 16:06

Because
a) it wasn't reported at the time
b) a year has passed and they said they don't standardly investigate breaches retrospectively

stalkersaga · 08/12/2021 16:12

Investigate how? At this stage, what could the police do that a journalist can't?

SickAndTiredAgain · 08/12/2021 16:12

I assume they were aware of it at the time, since there are officers at the entrances and exits, presumably watching people leave after the party. Or did everyone walk past them while pretending to be sober and talking loudly about how much work they’d been doing to keep them all there past midnight.
Hard to investigate something you turned a blind eye to when it happened.

shakingmytambourineatyou · 08/12/2021 16:14

I've already signed this. If people read the blurb that goes with it, then that asks more questions.

SoTiredNeedHoliday · 08/12/2021 16:16

@TeenMinusTests its the ruling government that has breached the covid rules, I am sure the Met has the power to investigate that even though a year has passed.

What about all those poor people that couldn't see their elderly or dying relatives or friends but no 10 can have a right old party...... total disgrace

OP posts:
Lockheart · 08/12/2021 16:18

Petitions aren't allowed on the main boards, OP.

IGotHam · 08/12/2021 16:18

I've sighed it

SoTiredNeedHoliday · 08/12/2021 16:18

Since, Cressida Dick, amongst others have refused to investigate the evidence that parties took place at Downing Street, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) must investigate why they have made this choice.

While U.K. Citizens were locked down & while London was in “tier 3” a Christmas party took place at 10 Downing Street on the night of 18th December through to early hours of the morning on 19th December 2020, several accounts have confirmed, including former chief of staff, Dominic Cummings.

In contrast, on the 17th December 2020 the Metropolitan Police posted on their Twitter account that they had “shut down” a wedding where 40 guests were gathered. In the same tweet they pointed out the risk to public health of such gatherings using these words: “holding large gatherings could mean the difference between life & death to someone else”. Why is it one rule for those in Downing Street and another for everyone else?

In March 2021 the Metropolitan Police used Covid-19 restrictions to break up public gatherings, including using force against women to break up a peaceful vigil following the murder of Sarah Everard on that occasion the risk to public health was cited when they stated: “we were placed into this position because of the overriding need to protect peoples safety”

It seems safety is only of concern to the Metropolitan Police when ordinary citizens gather but not when our Government puts public safety at risk.

The police are supposed to record every person entering 10 Downing Street. Did they on the night of the 18th? If not, why not?

Please investigate why party goers at number 10 Downing Street were exempt from rules imposed on the general public & why Metropolitan Police considered the large gathering at 10 Downing Street to pose less of a risk to public health than other gatherings.

OP posts:
PinkyPromises · 08/12/2021 16:20

I've signed. This is just such a slap in the face for all those people who did everything according to the rules.

Anordinarymum · 08/12/2021 16:20

I have signed it too because there is not one law for them and another for the rest of us

CorrBlimeyGG · 08/12/2021 16:22

a year has passed and they said they don't standardly investigate breaches retrospectively

Every other crime is investigated retrospectively, why not this one?

I know students that were fined for gatherings after the event. What makes this any different?

BigWoollyJumpers · 08/12/2021 16:23

Not signing, because it's a year ago, and quite honestly don't care if a bunch of people who were working all day together in an office, then had a "party" at the end of the day.

At the same time, DD was at school, having a xmas party, under much the same circumstances. Working with the same people all day, and then having a party to round the term off.

LivMumsnet · 08/12/2021 16:23

We've moved this to our Petitions and Activism topic now.

LethargicActress · 08/12/2021 16:28

I wouldn’t sign, because it would be hypocritical. I know plenty of people who stuck to the Christmas plans they’d made when they weren’t supposed to because we’d been put in tier 4. And people who had little ‘parties’ in their workplaces because they’d worked all through the lockdowns and already spent all day in the same building with each other without social distancing being required.

I don’t care about regular people doing it, so I can’t care about politicians doing it.

Imdreamingofapeacefulxmas · 08/12/2021 16:30

Id rather the police focus on their recent handling of serious crime cases at the moment!

StepAwayFromGoogling · 08/12/2021 16:31

What a waste of police time and money.

CorrBlimeyGG · 08/12/2021 16:33

Id rather the police focus on their recent handling of serious crime cases at the moment!

They can do both. Or at least, they should be able to.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page