Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

Am I the only person annoyed by 'dc is 2.5 etc'

26 replies

waitingforbedtime · 15/02/2010 16:50

When people say their dc is 2.5 to me that means they are two and a half and when people say their dc is 3.9 it means they are 9/10 of the way to being 4 but on mumsnet it doesnt mean that does it? I find it really irritating and I don't know why.

Am I the only one?

OP posts:
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 15/02/2010 16:52

You are not the only one. Even if people wrote 2,5 it would somehow be better. A . in the middle of numbers suggest decimal, which months are not!

Alibabaandthe40nappies · 15/02/2010 16:52

suggests

waitingforbedtime · 15/02/2010 16:53

Yes! It is the decimal point isn't it? Very annoying! [must get out more emoticon!]

OP posts:
nighbynight · 15/02/2010 17:54

2,5 means 2 and a half in the rest of europe. I always read 2.9 as two point nine, you are not alone.

cattj · 16/02/2010 21:27

Why not 2y6m?

Isn't that a lot more intuitive, even if it one character more to type.

hellymelly · 16/02/2010 21:33

it annoys me too and I do it,because everyone else does (sheepy emoticon).I have now been shamed and will revert to the 2y 9m.

CarryOnDancing · 17/02/2010 11:16

I didn't even know such an irritation existed until reading this! Argh leaves pedants corner immediately

said · 17/02/2010 11:19

You are not alone. I have no idea what age "they" mean when "they" do this.

Plonker · 17/02/2010 11:23

God no, this bugs the hell out of me too.

Although I have found myself doing it because I know that everyone understands it.

StealthPolarBear · 17/02/2010 11:25

yes, I used to think it was shorthand for 2 and a half. I use 2y6m

bronze · 17/02/2010 11:25

and me though I find myself to have started to join in this annoying thing

I still read it wrong though. By that I mean right but not what the author has meant

and I'm no pedant

StealthPolarBear · 17/02/2010 11:26

In fact it was only when I saw 2.7 or something and thought "how on earth do they know to that accuracy?" that realisation dawned

MyCatIsABastard · 17/02/2010 11:27

I've never given it any thought really and just assumed it was the MN way. I can't say it bothers me, however in a show of MN solidarity and to stop the possibility of any eyes bleeding I shall now use 'y' and 'm'

Coz I is nice, see

Lionstar · 17/02/2010 11:29

Well it's partly done because it's harder to work out the fraction in twelfths and convert to decimal. Also does it really matter, I mean if someone reads it the wrong way i.e. 2.5 as 2yrs6mths then they're hardly way off the mark and not a lot of baby development will be different in that time frame (as development is different for each child anyway)

StealthPolarBear · 17/02/2010 11:31

no Lionstar, just causes confusion when you see 2.7!
What's wrong with 2y7? Same no of characters and unambiguous

TrinityIsFallingApart · 17/02/2010 11:35

okay so a year isn't ten months so you cant decimalise it
is that rightI hadn't even realised I was annoying you lot

I would love to be a pedant but I'm too stupid

so my children are

3y and not quite 1m

4y10m

and 9y11m

is that ok

Lionstar · 17/02/2010 11:36

I don't disagree Stealth, I was just advancing a theory about why it was done and why it didn't really matter. It has just gained currency on MN therefore difficult to change. Your way is less confusing though - I shall endeavour to use

StealthPolarBear · 17/02/2010 11:36

much better Trinity

BitOfFun · 17/02/2010 11:37

I stopped thinking in months after about eighteen of 'em I think. Then they were toddlers, nursery age etc etc. I genuinely forget how old anybody in my family is tbh- especially me

StealthPolarBear · 17/02/2010 11:38

I think because when they're young (and especially when they're your first) you know their age to the day, literally. So I genuinely thought people knew that their babies were 2 and 7/10 of a year. And felt stupid.
I only have 2 but how things change. I text DH's cousin who had her PFB 13 hours after my youngest to see how old they are now

TheFallenMadonna · 17/02/2010 11:40

Does it actually confusion though, or does it just annoy you? Is it ever necessary to know the age of another poster's child to such a degree of accuracy?

PrivetDancer · 17/02/2010 11:40

2.5 seems ok as 2 and a half, but 2.11 confused the hell out of me the first time I saw it.

ivent · 17/02/2010 11:42

I sometimes do 2.5 because 2 1/2 looks weird.

waitingforbedtime · 18/02/2010 18:50

It doesn't cause confusion it is just annoying!

I will admit though that I have done it because I thought I 'should' and didn't want to be outed as a non mumsnetter!!!

From now on I shall just write 3y2m or normally I just write 3 or 3 and a half etc.

OP posts:
NoahAndTheWhale · 18/02/2010 18:58

It really doesn't bother me - it's just a form of shorthand.