Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

"One less thing to worry about"

9 replies

UnquietDad · 03/11/2009 15:02

It should be "one fewer", surely, according to The Rules? Things are countable. But that just sounds wrong.

Trying to think of similar expressions.

OP posts:
RealityBites · 03/11/2009 15:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

FabioExtremeAngler · 03/11/2009 15:04

Innit tho.

KurriKurri · 03/11/2009 15:26

'One thing fewer' sounds a bit better than 'one fewer thing'. I think its the inclusion of the 'one' in that expression that jars. 'If that happened, I'd have fewer things to worry about' sounds fine I think, not quite sure why though

prism · 05/11/2009 16:05

Well, 7 is one less than 8, so "one less thing" does in my opinion pass muster. But "less things" woulnd't.

prism · 05/11/2009 16:05

That's "wouldn't".

nickelbang · 05/11/2009 16:31

it's messy this one.

i would be inclined to say fewer is correct, with the noun going first (one thing fewer to worry about)

but i've just been googling and several grammar sites and opinions seem to disagree.

looks like it could be either, then.

(i know if it's a fraction then it's less (less than 1/3) but i'm not sure where one sits in the argument.

Jacksmama · 06/11/2009 00:09

The phrase should be "I couldn't care less". Perhaps Americans think it's energy-saving to leave out a few letters.

I love Pedants' Corner.

nickelbang · 06/11/2009 11:27

maybe they don't want to offend anyone, so by saying they could care less, means that although they really don't care about this particular thing, there are things that they would care less for.

or "i could care less, but i don't want to, so i'm not going to"

i'm not defending it, though.

i love pedants' corner too

Jacksmama · 06/11/2009 14:48
New posts on this thread. Refresh page