Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

Whose x2 question

16 replies

Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 14:44

So if you want to say something belongs to two people- for example you’re talking to Andy and his wife is called Mel and you’re talking about their children, but Andy has more children from a previous marriage, would you say about their shared children
“yours and Mel’s children,” or “your and Mel’s children” or something else?? I think it’s the first one but nothing ever sounds quite right!

OP posts:
ReignOfError · 02/04/2026 14:47

I’d say Mel’s and your children, or you and Mel’s children. No idea why, mind.

Snowie99 · 02/04/2026 15:12

I thought you were going to ask about whose and who’s as I never know with those two

isthesolution · 02/04/2026 15:14

Emma and Sally?! (Or whatever their names are)

Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 15:28

Snowie99 · 02/04/2026 15:12

I thought you were going to ask about whose and who’s as I never know with those two

Oh no! It’s whose for like whose is this? Whereas who’s is always a contraction for e.g who is or who has

OP posts:
Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 15:28

isthesolution · 02/04/2026 15:14

Emma and Sally?! (Or whatever their names are)

Avoidance!

OP posts:
Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 15:29

ReignOfError · 02/04/2026 14:47

I’d say Mel’s and your children, or you and Mel’s children. No idea why, mind.

Mel’s and your could work

OP posts:
Raera · 02/04/2026 16:19

“yours and Mel’s children,” or “your and Mel’s children”

Take the words "and Mel's" out of your sentence.
You wouldn't say "yours children" so the latter is correct.

ChristmasStars · 02/04/2026 17:22

Raera · 02/04/2026 16:19

“yours and Mel’s children,” or “your and Mel’s children”

Take the words "and Mel's" out of your sentence.
You wouldn't say "yours children" so the latter is correct.

I think this in theory but it doesn't sound right. Have my ears just become accustomed to something that isn't right?

Snowie99 · 02/04/2026 19:47

Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 15:28

Oh no! It’s whose for like whose is this? Whereas who’s is always a contraction for e.g who is or who has

Oh ok thank you, so it’s all to do with the apostrophe

Bonsaibaby · 03/04/2026 15:02

ChristmasStars · 02/04/2026 17:22

I think this in theory but it doesn't sound right. Have my ears just become accustomed to something that isn't right?

Yes! That’s what I mean! Also isn’t that like saying “Me and Andy” as opposed to “Andy and me?”

OP posts:
PleasantPedant · 03/04/2026 16:04

@Snowie99 , I try not to use contractions when writing because it's easy to use the wrong one, and the spellchecker does not spot them.

Your and Mel's children because they're both your children and Mel's children.

BrickBiscuit · 05/04/2026 12:58

'Andy's and Mel's children', the children of Andy and those of Mel.
'Yours and Mel's children', ditto, spoken to Andy.
'Andy and Mel's children', the children of Andy and Mel.
'Your and Mel's children', ditto, spoken to Andy.
(Not sure about that second line).

Bonsaibaby · 06/04/2026 00:29

Brill thank you!

OP posts:
Okaylie · 08/04/2026 01:40

Bonsaibaby · 02/04/2026 15:28

Avoidance!

Yes! I agree with pp. If you’re tying yourself in knots it’s often better to recast the sentence.

Bonsaibaby · 08/04/2026 05:33

Just interested in the grammar!

OP posts:
BrickBiscuit · 08/04/2026 09:09

Bonsaibaby · 08/04/2026 05:33

Just interested in the grammar!

Yes, agreed. It may be safer to reword, but that doesn't answer the question. I think my earlier stab at 'Yours and Mel's children' - addressing Andy about his children and Mel's children - is wrong. I would like to know if it can be done correctly and without ambiguity.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page