Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

commas in complex sentences

16 replies

simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 18:03

I need some help please - the more pedantic the better. This is driving me crazy.

Where do you put the comma if you have a subordinate clause directly following a co-ordinating conjunction.

For instance, which of these is correct?

(a) I believe in dragons, and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture.

(b) I believe in dragons, and if I meet one, I'll take a picture.

(c) I believe in dragons, and if I meet one I'll take a picture.

Recommendations for books which might tell me the answer also much appreciated.

OP posts:
redhat · 06/06/2016 18:07

I'm rubbish at commas but from DS2's year 4 homework two weeks ago I would guess (a) is correct but that (c) would also be seen because its of people worry about putting in too many comas. B definitely isn't right.

KP86 · 06/06/2016 18:16

Actually, I would use two commas: after 'and' and 'one'.

The rule I follow is this - if you take the bit in commas out of the sentence, does it still make sense?

But, I'm not a perfect grammar user!

StVincent · 06/06/2016 18:20

I believe in dragons and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture

Would probably do that.

PolterGoose · 06/06/2016 18:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 18:28

Thank you for answers!

Hmm - that would certainly get rid of the clumsy comma pile up.

But I thought the rule was that if you have two full independent clauses joined by a co-ordinating conjunction (e.g, 'and'), you have to use a comma before the conjunction?

OP posts:
simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 18:30

And I am now wondering about the punctuation in my last sentence. Should there be a comma between 'that' and 'if'?

OP posts:
BoGrainger · 06/06/2016 18:36

How about a semi-colon?Grin
I believe in dragons; if I meet one I'll take a picture.

ImperialBlether · 06/06/2016 18:40

I believe in dragons and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture.

This is correct!

simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 19:15

Fair point Bo and Polter. But, for the sake of the argument, if I want to keep it as one sentence, which is correct?

Imperial, you sound very authoritative, so I am inclined to believe you. But why is that correct? Is there an exception to the rule I stated above?

If we took out the conditional, it would be:

'I believe in dragons, and I want to find one.'

So why does the comma disappear?

OP posts:
redhat · 06/06/2016 19:25

isn't because you're introducing a new sub clause by adding the "iif I meet one" ?

I believe in dragons, and I'll take a picture

I believe in dragons, and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture.

redhat · 06/06/2016 19:26

Hmm, my bold didn't work

simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 19:32

redhat - sorry, I should have phrased that better:

So why does the comma before the 'and' disappear?

You've kept it, which was my first guess for the right answer also - (a) in the OP - but imperial and others are saying it shouldn't be there.

OP posts:
redhat · 06/06/2016 19:58

I don't think it does disappear Grin

I believe in dragons, and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture.

I'm not great at grammar (at school in the 70s/80s) but the DSs do loads.

KickAssAngel · 06/06/2016 20:04

'If I meet one' is the subordinate clause and should therefore have commas around it.

Whether there should be a comma before a conjunction or not is a matter for debate. The more traditional answer is yes, the more modern answer (and traditional in the US) is no.

So you could have: "I believe in dragons, and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture"; or, "I believe in dragons and, if I meet one, I'll take a picture".

OR you could view "If I meet one I'll take a picture" as a sentence by itself and simply join the two sentences with the conjunction "and", with an optional comma after it.

I have seen different answers in different grammar books btw, but one easy reference is Grammar Girl on youtube. She tends to be correct, although American!

simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 20:42

Thanks again for answers, everyone.

Kickass - I think you may have the answer: if a comma before a co-ordinating conjunction is optional, then the problem disappears. But are you sure? I tried googling grammar girl on the subject, and the best I could find was:

"...when you join two things that could be sentences on their own with a word such as “and,” “but,” or “or,” you need a comma before the conjunction:

Squiggly ran to the forest, and Aardvark chased the peeves."

www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/comma-splice

And this - i.e., that you do need the comma - agrees with everything else I've found on the topic (though I've not found anything on the specific construction in the the OP, hence my question).

reddit - Me too, I was at school a while after you, but I only got taught grammar for foreign languages unfortunately.

OP posts:
simonettavespucci · 06/06/2016 20:47

Nb For total clarity that should be "if a comma before a co-ordinating conjunction which is joining two independent clauses is optional".

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread