Quick help me with this sentence please !!

[olaflikeswarmhugs]

... Work for an employer who is not a business whose goal is to make money ...

... Work for an employer which is not a business whose goal is to make money ...

...work for an employer that is not a business whose goal is to make money ...

Is one right or are they all wrong

Tbh they all sound very clumsy. Do you want suggestions for a rewrite?

Third I'd say but don't really understand it

Work for an employer that is a business whose goal is not to make money...?

That's not the complete sentence don't want to write the rest it might out me

Also thanks

2 or 3, probably 3. Tbh none of them are great, but I can't offer a credible alternative.

Work for an employer which runs as a not for profit business.

...work for a not-for-profit employer.

More concise.

The problem you have is a relative clause of a relative clause.

Head wrecking!

I don't think you need 'that is a business". Otherwise agree with Theend

...work for an employer whose business does not have "making money" as its primary goal.

Maybe?

work for an employer whose goal is not to make money

How's this ?

...and work for an employer whose goal is not to make money , but a public service whose goal is to provide care for people who need it .

Strictly speaking it should be 'that' not 'which' in this case, as the second part of the sentence is essential to the meaning, not an additional piece. 'Who' is wrong because it's not a person but a business or other organisation. So number 3 is the best option. But Funky's rewrite is much better.

that doesn't sound right. it would have to be something like:

not to work for an employer whose goal is to make money, but a public service which provides care for people who need it .

(there are too many goals in your last sentence, and the two halves don't agree)

nah, you can use which or that since its a restrictive relative clause, you just can't use that for a non-restrictive relative clause. don't need the information? comma, which. do need the information? no comma, that or which.

you can't use who, though, it's a business, not a person.

...work for a non-profit organisation.

....Work for an employer whose main focus is not profit, but providing care for those that need it?

I initially read it to mean the employer is not a business, but did want to make money. portion just me but not totally clear.
not for profit usually indicates a charity or campaigning org. would 'social enterprise' fit? ... work for a social enterprise... (they often are for profit but that is not the primary aim)

probably not portion

Thanks MNers but I gave up and chucked it