Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

To Three or not to Three, that is The Question

76 replies

almost40 · 15/08/2005 16:25

I am selfishly starting another thread on this much debated topic. I have two lovely DDS who are 3 yo and 18 mos. DH wants more. Things are generally comfortable and good. Should we try for a Third or quit here? I am almost 40. TIA.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
clary · 16/08/2005 17:22

almost40 I work full-time (more or less).
It's Ok. No worse with 3 than 2 tbh.

Fennel · 16/08/2005 18:35

almost40, yes I am sure larger gaps would sometimes help.

on the plus side I never felt complete with two and there was always an itch for a 3rd, and my 3rd - dd3, age 16 months - is absoloutely lovely. But it is intense. they are more than a one-person job a lot of the time.

aloha · 16/08/2005 18:43

Twiglett - that's so right about how babies make you feel young - a young family - and I like that feeling (esp as clearly really middleaged!). I also really like it when my stepdaughter is around and there are three children (albeit one a young teenager) in the house, sitting round the kitchen table eating pasta. It's a lovely feeling. I'm glad I have her and it does mean my two have an extra sibling. Dh is quite, quite certain he does not want four!

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

aloha · 16/08/2005 18:44

And before you say it, I know I don't like pasta, but I do quite like dumping a big bowl of it on the table for everyone!

almost40 · 16/08/2005 20:04

Thank you all for posting. The last time I asked this same question, the mums of three seemed to indicate that there is a particular sense - not rational or orderly - that you get when you hav ethree children. Aloha, it is probably the sense you get when as you put it, you have three children sitting around a table. I have one friend with all three close together, and it just seems like way too much work. But it seems ideal to have them somewhat spaced apart, if you do opt for three and can control the timing. . Bumblelion, it must help that your three are spaced so. I can't imagine managing on my own with two, much less three. My hat is off to you.

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 14:36

A late contribution. I am going for ttc for no. 3 in Jan / Feb to aim for an October baby. If I conceive straight away (I did for the other two) then I will have, in October 2006: A 4.3 yr old, a 2.6 yr old and a newborn.

With a small age gap between my first 2 (21 months) parenting has always been quite frantic, so perhaps naively I am not expecting it to be too much more challenging. Anyway dd will be in Reception class when third baby is born, so for most of the time Monday to Friday I'll just have a toddler and baby to care for - which is pretty much what I'm used to.

Perhaps I am living in a fool's paradise. Also blessed with a mature first child - dd, who is currently only just turned 3 is already quite reasonable / rational. She has her moments sure, but most of the time I can rely on her not to run off in the shops / park whatever, or run into roads and so forth.

oliveoil · 17/08/2005 14:44

Well I was extremely broody a few weeks ago but I had one of those days that turned into one of those weeks that turned into one of those fortnights....you get the picture. No more for me!

dd1 is 2.9yrs and dd2 is 1 at the end of this month so I don't thing the close age gaps helps matters.

Financially it would be a disaster as well as I would have to give up work.

handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 15:03

OO your age gap for your two is identical to mine. 21 months right?

oliveoil · 17/08/2005 15:06

22 months. I have the wrinkles to prove it as well, v tiring. Some days I want to run away. But most of the time it is fab.

almost40 · 17/08/2005 15:06

I forgot to mention that both my mum and mil are making comments that I should stop at two, as though I am overwhelmed with two - how would I cope with three. I don't feel overwhelmed, and I find it really annoying that they make these types of comments. Meanwhile others, including DH, think we should have a third as soon as possible because of the risk of downs etc. going up significantly with each year now. The more I think about it, the more I think I want number 3, but I just want to wait a few years and have him (hopefully) when I'm 41 or 42, and DD2 would be 3 or 4.

OP posts:
almost40 · 17/08/2005 15:07

HMC - I'm curious about your timing - why an October baby, and why 2.6 years after your youngest? Also, are you working outside the home?

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 15:11

A40,

October baby to:

  • spread out kids birthdays (already have April and July featured)
  • because I want the child to be one of the oldest in the school year rather than one of the youngest (like my dd will be as a July baby). Some summer babes struggle in reception class as youngest in the year - but not all.
  • I favour small age gaps and would have gone for smaller than 2.6 if it had been feasible, but that would have been too much to take on with two lo's already
  • Oldest child will be at school when 3rd child comes along which will cut me some slack..
handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 15:13

Forgot to say, yes am working part time 3 days a week, but will be jacking that in. I could continue working with 3, but tbh I don't enjoy my job and we don't need the 2nd income so I might as well quit.

Oh and my MIL and mother will doubtless be horrified to hear about ttc for no. 3. That's a common reaction! [rueful smile]

handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 15:14

Also forgot to mention, am similarly ancient and almost 40 (well 37)

almost40 · 17/08/2005 15:28

hmc, I like your style. It sounds like you have made your decision after much deliberate thought and analysis. I can't think so clearly and too influenced by others. Mumsnet is good though for people like me. And by the way, 37 is closer to 35 than to 40 - not that age matters. . .

OP posts:
handlemecarefully · 17/08/2005 15:31

Thanks almost

Of course there is always the possibility that my reasoning may be deeply flawed!

almost40 · 17/08/2005 15:32

True, but at least you have gone through the process.

OP posts:
Issymum · 17/08/2005 15:46

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request

aloha · 17/08/2005 22:08

I think lovely parents with lovely children should always have more if they want....

Issymum · 18/08/2005 17:22

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request

mumtosomeone · 18/08/2005 17:23

I would say go for it!
you are fit and healthy!!!??? age is just a number!

fruitful · 18/08/2005 17:32

Can someone tell me - do you ever stop wanting a baby? I mean every time I have one, they go and turn into toddlers. Very nice toddlers, but then I want a baby again. Is this feeling going to go away if I have 4? (have 2 at the mo)

I look at my two and think "amazing, but its not enough". I'm worried I'll always feel that way. Like your income - you always want 10% more than you've got...

You see, if I'm always going to want a baby anyway, I should quit while we can still afford the swimming lessons (and while I've only had a "little split" and not a major scar rupture ).

Can't believe I'm broody already. He sleeps through for one night and look what happens.

spidermama · 18/08/2005 17:36

I thought I'd stopped after my number 4 (who's six months old now) and I've begun getting rid of cribs and clothes and nappies and all sorts. However I think twinges of broodiness might be returning even now, to my utter horror.

expatinscotland · 18/08/2005 17:36

I saw my baby on a scan today (23 weeks) and got all broody!

mumtosomeone · 18/08/2005 17:53

i felt 'complete' when I had no 3!!

errr......

got 5 now!!!!!