Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

teaching child to read

26 replies

Satellite · 22/01/2010 03:26

Has anyone tried either of the following methods to teach your child to read?

  1. Glenn Doman - by sight
  2. Sidney Ledson - by phonics

Any comments on them?

Where do you get the materials from? Only came across the sidney ledson book, not the materials.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
BuccaBucca12345 · 08/05/2012 18:46

Hi,

I have a newborn and read 3 of the Doman books and felt it made common sense and it appealed to me.

I searched these fora for arguments against and found lots of mums saying things like "let a child be a child", "kids don't need to read, crawl early, do maths....etc" Well that's their opinion, but its just an opinion, and was backed up with nothing, so I ignored it.
My thought at this time was if the kid enjoys it, why not do it, Doman has shown its of benefit, so if its doing no harm, why not take as much good from it as you can - makes sense right?
Well now I learn Doman is widely discredited in much of his work, which throws into doubt all his claims, and also rubbishes my own argument that doing will be of some benefit.
I'm not going to be doing this programme, despite having bought books and built materials and am writing this post to give a proper negative argument for people like me who may be looking for a concrete against argument before deciding to go ahead.
Do what you like with your kids, but if you are thinking of this please read the following links, including one from the American Academy of Paediatrics. In short:

"The Doman-Delacato patterning technique is pseudoscience because it is premised on a bankrupt and discarded theory and, more importantly, has failed to demonstrate any significant effectiveness under controlled conditions, and yet it is being purveyed as an innovative and effective treatment, and even possibly a cure. The IAHP and NACD cannot support the claims that they make, and are therefore guilty of fraud. Current regulations should prevent such abuse, but unfortunately such institutions as the FDA lack the manpower and the teeth to properly enforce such regulations and fulfill their role to protect the public from the snake-oil salesman, dressed up in the modern clothes of alternative medicine, that increasingly prey upon the vulnerable, the sick, and the desperate."

pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/104/5/1149.full

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheInstitutes_for_the_Achievement_of_Human_Potential#

www.srmhp.org/archives/patterning.html

New posts on this thread. Refresh page