Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Is having an easy (non colicy) baby parenting or luck?

9 replies

Reallytired · 19/07/2009 16:54

I think its luck. My son was a very challenging baby where as my daughter is one of the easiest babies in the world to look after. Yet the way I have parented both children is very similar.

I know several people who had an easy first baby and then a colicy challenging second baby.

Prehaps difficult babies are difficult for a reason. For example I think my son was born before he was ready. I also had a really long labour.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
ChasingSquirrels · 19/07/2009 16:57

Mine were the other way round, ds1 couldn't have been easier to look after, and continues to be a very easy child.
ds2 was bloody hard hard hard work.

Just who they are!

Karam · 19/07/2009 17:21

I think possibly a bit of both is true.

I think the baby has the personality the baby has got, some babies are happy chappies, others are more uptight and so on...

But I also think that sometimes the way you react to the child can also change things. I know with DD1, I was a lot more uptight about doing everything perfectly, and she was more uptight as a result, whereas with DD2, I was so much more relaxed and confident, and didn't stress about anything - whether she cried or anything, and so she was a lot more chilled out. I think babies can and do pick up on the tension around them (that is what the experts say isn't it?). I certainly think that was true with my DDs.

Jaquelinehyde · 19/07/2009 17:23

It's good luck without a doubt.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

juuule · 19/07/2009 17:23

It's luck.

becktay · 19/07/2009 19:14

i think there's a bit of both though mainly luck. you have less of a learning curve 2nd time so you can go with the flow a bit more. looking back i was very precious newborn with ds1. don't have time to be that with ds2 and he is much more chilled out, but i do suspect that he is prob that kind of person too.

MrsBadger · 19/07/2009 20:01

if it's not colic it's something else

dd had no digestive issues at all but sleep was another story

a friends' son ate and slept like an angel but had recurrent lung problems

etc etc

dinny · 19/07/2009 21:17

agree, it's luck

dd1 was born before she was ready (35 weeks) and was v colicky and cried all the time for about 4 months

ds and dd2 were term and neither have been colicky

BriocheDoree · 20/07/2009 13:08

Luck.
DD was the easiest newborn, and a real handful as a toddler (just calming down at 5). DS was a nightmare newbie, silent reflux and not sleeping through the night until 10 mos, and is now a laid back 2 year old dream.

Allegrogirl · 20/07/2009 13:58

Luck. We had a hideous first 6 months with a puking, colicky baby. I felt like a useless, failing mother. Post weaning she has been a little ray of sunshine. All I did differently was give her food. I think the cuddling and rocking through the colic days helped her be a happy child later on.

The parenting books that blame lack of routine for all problems are very hurtful to parents living with a 'difficult' baby but the likes of GF strongly imply it's the parents fault.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page