Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

The best age to start a family is 34

61 replies

Tinker · 24/04/2005 21:15

It says here

What do you think?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Sponge · 25/04/2005 16:23

I had dd at 37 and ds at 41. Not really by choice but the way it worked out and I'm pretty happy with the result. I certainly don't feel I'm neurotic.
On the other hand my mum had us at 19 and 20 and she was a great mum so clearly anything can work if the individual circumstyances are right.

JoolsToo · 25/04/2005 16:25

what do 'experts' know if I'd waited that long I'd have ended up with one child - I menopaused at 36! (thank you expert!)

heffalump · 25/04/2005 16:32

My mum was almost 40 when she had me ( I was the last of 6 children),and she was a fantastic mum. Sadly she died of ovarian cancer at the age of 58. I admit I sometimes worry about being an older mum for this reason. I want to see my daughter go to college, get married etc (if she so chooses).It hurt that mum wasn't there for my wedding and to see my little girl. I know a younger mum can also get ill but it is more likely when you are older.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

edam · 25/04/2005 16:34

Well, I think it's pretty spot-on. Purely because I was 34 when I had ds. If I'd been any older or younger, it would have been drivel .

Iklboo · 25/04/2005 16:38

I'll be 36 when I have my 1st in November. Just wondering why they're assuming that because I'm having one baby, I'm going to want to pop out a few more? Thought we'd done away with the "heir and spare" mindset.
(not saying I DON'T want more than one of course) [grin}

heffalump · 25/04/2005 16:41

Good luck to you Iklboo!

muminlondon · 25/04/2005 16:54

They didn't say what age the father should be!

swedishmum · 26/04/2005 02:04

Had mine at 29, 31, 32 and 39 (surprise). I don't feel old and past it, and although I did lots of travel before no 1 still manage to get some done now. Dd at 15 months has visited 12 countries and currently lives abroad. I went skiing for the first time this year and am more flexible, relaxed, and yes, more financially sorted than some of my friends. I never felt tired when baby 4 was tiny - I still smile when she wakes up in the night. And I think she's more laid back because we are relaxed parents. If I'd started earlier I'd have 11 by now!!

Mog · 26/04/2005 07:58

Cruncie - In my experience pediatricians doing ward rounds are quite happy to whisk through the wards in the minimum time ( a human trait) and therefore perhaps prefer it if parents don't ask many questions. I would guess that older mums might be more confident and challenging at asking questions and therefore have been labelled neurotic just because they make life a bit more difficult.
Realise we're talking generalisations here but certainly found they would be quite happy to move on and you had to be quite forceful to have a situation explained fully.

sansouci · 26/04/2005 08:11

I don't think you can always choose when to have children. I didn't meet dh until I was 32 & he was dead against getting married again and/or having any (more) children. I had dd at 37 & ds at 40. I definitely do NOT have the energy to go through another pg at 42. I'm still reeling from ds! I should show this to my sister, who's 33, lives alone with her cat & her laptop & has never had a boyfriend, as far as I know. She desperately wants children. She'd better get busy!

heffalump · 26/04/2005 10:41

Asolutely. I was married to dh for 7 years before he finally decided he did want to have children after all. It then took over a year for us to concieve which ended in miscarriage, and then another 6 months to concieve our dd.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread