Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Following on from other thread - Would you go out if you thought your ds ^might^ be infectious with chicken pox?

4 replies

neolara · 05/12/2008 13:20

My dd had chicken pox last week. We stayed in the whole week. It was VERY dull. I'm now waiting for my ds to come out in spots. So far there has been no sign. We have been avoiding baby groups and other places where I think there might be pregnant women and very young children. However, we have been to parks and also shopping.

Given that the incubation period is 10 to 21 days and he might have become infected on the last day of my dd's illness, to avoid all risks of infecting others in theory I might have to put ourselves in isolation for a month in total (one week for dd and then another three waiting to see if the spots come out). Would you put yourself into total isolation? Or would you just try to avoid "vulnerable groups"? Just go on as normal until spots appear?

Incidentally, we went on holiday for a week with a child who developed chicken pox (stayed in the same house, shared baths etc). I put us all in isolation on our return and neither of my two got it. We have had other numerous occasions in the past where the dcs have been exposed to a less concentrated extent and not got it.

OP posts:
DoNotsAntlers · 05/12/2008 13:25

I wouldn't worry too much about it. I possibly wouldn't wouldn't visit someones home if they were in teh last month of pregnancy or had a baby under 4wks - which is the most serious risk. Not so much because of the risk of infecting them - more because I would feel horrifically guilty if I did IYSWIM.

No need for compelete isolation though IMO.

AMumInScotland · 05/12/2008 13:28

We all "might" be infectious with all sorts of things, you can't be expected to put yourselves into total isolation just in case. Avoiding high-risk groups when you think the risk is higher than usual seems like a fair compromise.

pluckyyuletideducky · 05/12/2008 14:22

Agree with donuts and muminscotland. Avoid high risk groups where possible but you can't put your life on hold 'just in case'. There were 3 outbreaks of chickenpox at ds' nursery before he caught it, so your ds may not get it this time.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

MummyGorilla · 05/12/2008 16:47

I had a couple of incidences where DS was exposed, so I kept away from various friends - pregnant ones, those with newborns, ones who were due to fly etc. And then he didn't get it. By the time DD came along, the prospect of spending however many weeks waiting for it to incubate in both of them was too much, and I got them vaccinated.

Vaccination also means they are pretty much 100% protected from a severe case, which was also important to me as we have know a child who suffered life-threatening complications with the cp virus.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread