Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Rush to diagnose ADHD and autism can damage children: As rates soar up to 40-fold, a major review warns of the toll on those wrongly given a label

279 replies

Rubydobydo · 09/10/2026 09:04

Britain risks harming a generation of children by over-diagnosing ADHD and autism, a major review warns today.
Parents are incentivised to have their children diagnosed by misguided schools and welfare systems that reward such 'labels', the report found.
Youngsters have also been influenced by social media posts that wrongly present common traits as evidence of the conditions.
https://www.dailymail.com/health/article-16194777/Rush-diagnose-ADHD-autism-damage-children.html

Discuss?

ADHD - News and Updates on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Daily Mail Online

Get the latest news and updates on ADHD - Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder - from Mail Online.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/adhd/index.html

OP posts:
muminherts · 09/10/2026 21:14

The wait locally for dx is three years. Not quite a rush…

twinkletoesimnot · 09/10/2026 21:21

ohfook · 09/10/2026 12:12

I think we’re in the middle of a huge pendulum swing as our understanding of neurodiversity increases so yes maybe it does feel like we’re over diagnosing at the moment as our awareness and understanding increased. I’ve heard it say a few times that our understanding of ADHD is currently akin to when doctors were treating physical ailments with leeches so there is still a lot we don’t know.

This next is just what I think based on my own work so not rooted in academic research or anything, but I think over the next decade or so we’ll come to understand adhd as an umbrella term to describe a set of behaviours with a range of different origins (early trauma, genetics, early exposure to substance abuse etc).

It’s a fairly controversial/unpopular theory here but is gaining more traction in Eastern Europe but I also think we’ll have a better picture in a decade or so about the impact of processed food, screen time and microplastics are having on the brain. Again just my opinion but I personally think screen time is a double edged sword as it really helps children to regulate also killing attention span in the long run and possibly reducing resilience too.

I also believe that we create this artificial situation of young children sitting in seats under fluorescent lights with minimal chance for movement then complain when we realise they don’t all fit that mold. Children need regular movement and hands on experience of things to thrive. Most schools do t even have an afternoon break past ks2 now then end up having to send restless kids on movement breaks.

I feel like I’m on such a rant now that I’ve lost track of the original question but it’s such an interesting topic and a lot of it is very tricky to unpick because a child raised by parents with undiagnosed adhd is fairly likely to also have adhd, but how do you unpick whether it’s genetic or whether it’s from living in a chaotic home.

Again I think it’s a good thing that more people with adhd are receiving support although very very recently I’ve heard people being told essentially yes you have it but you’re managing so there’s no point giving you a diagnosis - basically if you can mask enough to hold down a job, but equally I don’t think we should lose sight of the fact that the human personality is a huge spectrum. I really don’t like the ‘5 signs you have adhd’ videos you see on TikTok because a lot of them describe perfectly normal behaviours (and also describe perimenopause very well too) and don’t help people in the long run I don’t think.

My final point is that there’s a lot of crap spouted as a fact ( remember people saying that adhd meds had an opposite effect if taken by someone who didn’t act have adhd) and the one thing I’ve noticed through my work is that the higher up someone is in the field, the more they acknowledge they don’t know enough about it yet and that we’re still learning. The people I come across who know for certain what causes it or know for certain that a healthy breakfast and a good bit of discipline will cure it are generally the least knowledgeable about it.

Best post I’ve seen in a while.

I think it’s all these things and probably a few more but they are all so unpopular/ uncomfortable to discuss that it just doesn’t happen.

I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with any of these things but a few things I wonder about

Genetic link - there are people having children now (often multiple) who once upon a time would have been in institutions or at least, at home living with family forever.

Extremely premature birth - while we all would want our babies ‘saved’ if born early - it does undoubtedly cause some issues for many children. For many diagnoses, this is one of the first questions asked.

As mentioned, diet, microplastics, screens - all super important.

Older mothers may also be a factor - hell, even wi-fi maybe!

Use of childcare from a very early age - quite a few autism diagnoses could also be trauma / attachment issues.

But people can’t afford to have children earlier, or be sahp these days, so the government aren’t going to address this in a million years.

Also life is just too much! Too much to fit into a day, too much in the curriculum …. Children are never allowed to be bored anymore.

twinkletoesimnot · 09/10/2026 21:29

Iizzyb · 09/10/2026 20:36

I totally agree with pp’s saying that we just know more now, so more people are being diagnosed because parents etc recognise a potential issue or need (are there really more stars now or just better telescopes?!)

the other side of things though is that school funding has been pared right back so there are fewer TA’s in classes to give extra support, everything is more stretched so less support can be given as usual arrangements without an EHCP.

I just want ds to be able to support himself as an adult and have a good & happy life. It’s so frustrating when so much time and energy has to be spent on dealing with a really unreasonable school placing silly demands on him, whilst telling me (Attendance Officer) that I need to try harder to get him back to school but they make no effort at all to remove the barriers which sometimes prevent him from going (not the responsibility of the Attendance Manager)

if school removed those barriers for him, the whole class would benefit too

Out of interest what would you call barriers and ‘silly demands?’

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

SupernaturalAddict · 09/10/2026 21:31

I won't comment on ADHD as I don't know or understand enough about it.

What is diagnosed as autism has changed massively over the years, mostly politically motivated (lobbying). Autism is an umbrella diagnosis so a group of behaviours with an unknown number of different causes. Just look at the varying genetic causes.

I don't believe this is helpful, it makes finding a cause especially for those with the most severe autism more difficult and it's stopping those with mental health needs getting those needs met.

I do wonder how many kids have trauma and how many middle aged women would benefit from better peri/ menopausal support, how many people generally require decent mental health support but are instead given an ASD diagnosis and sent on their way.

I also think the industry surrounding SEND needs regulating in some way. We have vast numbers of private therapists etc earning a very good living off kids not having their needs met. Inde and non maintained schools are vastly more expensive than their state counterparts (who are usually nowhere near as good or capable) and while LA's pay for these places they can't invest in or improve state provision to what it needs to be likewise taxi contracts and school transport. None of this is the parents fault, it's a vastly underfunded system.

I did read a post up thread where someone had questioned the use of the term complex needs. I think this is being used more now to help with funding as having complex needs is part of the assessment for chc funding which splits the social care cost between the nhs and the la. Not in every case but in some.

suburburban · 09/10/2026 21:38

In the past people left school earlier and there were more jobs which could be done without a degree or qualifications. There were 2 world wars

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 21:44

4DCheckmate · 09/10/2026 19:45

Except that autism is a neurodevelopmental condition, so you’re entirely wrong. Firstly, there is undeniable scientific evidence that it is genetic. Secondly, part of the diagnostic criteria is that it must be evidenced that the condition has been present throughout the child’s life. Therefore, by definition anything that was caused by childhood experiences is not autism because it doesn’t meet the diagnostic criteria, e.g. environmental factors after a child is born such as “spending far too long in childcare” (if one was to have any scientific evidence for this negatively impacting children in a statistically significant manner, which there is not) or “permissive parenting” (!?).

Are you completely dismissing the idea that maternal stress whilst baby is in utero, has absolutely no consequences or correlation to their neurological development? Wow is all I can say. Why people struggle to understand this basic concept is beyond me. It’s certainty a legitimate area of research, and rightly so. Autism is an umberella term now. At its purest form, yes of course there are genetic links. That doesn’t explain the sudden explosion in primary schools though - and no, you can’t account all of that due to more awareness and diagnosis.

SupernaturalAddict · 09/10/2026 21:51

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 21:44

Are you completely dismissing the idea that maternal stress whilst baby is in utero, has absolutely no consequences or correlation to their neurological development? Wow is all I can say. Why people struggle to understand this basic concept is beyond me. It’s certainty a legitimate area of research, and rightly so. Autism is an umberella term now. At its purest form, yes of course there are genetic links. That doesn’t explain the sudden explosion in primary schools though - and no, you can’t account all of that due to more awareness and diagnosis.

I agree epigenetics is much more likely.

NAS have done a huge disservice by implying autism is passed on soley from parents. Even their own website lists other causes which they have chosen to down play as it doesn't fit with their narrative, again politics at play.

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 21:52

4DCheckmate · 09/10/2026 18:38

You can pay several thousand pounds for a diagnostic assessment, yes. Many people are forced to do so because despite a huge amount of tax being taken from us supposedly to fund a healthcare system, it may as well not exist for all the use it is. In fact, NHS paediatricians often ADVISE parents of children referred to them for autism diagnosis to get a private diagnosis if possible because if they wait for the NHS to do it their children will be leaving secondary school before the NHS actually bothers to carry out the diagnostic process.

It’s expensive because it’s done by highly experienced consultant neurologists and paediatricians and SALTs and OTs etc working in a multidisciplinary team. It involves numerous assessments and input from the various specialists. That does not mean that a diagnosis will be given, obviously. Unless you’re suggesting that all of these unrelated specialists who often don’t know each other at all are somehow colluding and putting their careers and professional qualifications at risk to lie and provide fake diagnoses. To what end? Why would they take such a risk? It’s not remotely plausible I’m afraid. They get paid either way and would face being struck off if diagnosing people without sufficient evidence. Why would they?

Delusional.

Edited

Because it’s their job, it’s their profession. Mental health has always been big business. We need the stigma, even though society pretends it doesn’t. What on earth would all these professionals do, if we all suddenly became a nation of functioning, regulated individuals? Shit themselves, that’s what. It’s created a whole industry. ADHD coaches, SEN tutors, the list is endless.

Have you ever sat in a MDT team meeting? Professionals disagree all the time. Take mental health, whatever lens you want to apply. Biological, psychological, social, occupational, psychoanalytical….. why not add neurodevelopmental to the list? Hate to break it to you, but they’re just pulling a pay cheque and ticking the boxes too. And you’re the one who’s called me delusional? Interesting.

*caveat - I am not referring to individuals who quite clearly have learning disabilities.

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 21:54

SupernaturalAddict · 09/10/2026 21:51

I agree epigenetics is much more likely.

NAS have done a huge disservice by implying autism is passed on soley from parents. Even their own website lists other causes which they have chosen to down play as it doesn't fit with their narrative, again politics at play.

Absolutely.

dippy567 · 09/10/2026 21:58

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 09/10/2026 09:45

I agree with the report.

But ASD and ADHD have become an identity now, so people become very angry and defensive if you ask even sensible questions.

It’s not hard to see there has been an absolute explosion of diagnoses, far beyond what you would expect from better screening. Not only that but every single issue is put down to ASD or ADHD - when was the last time you heard about any young person being diagnosed with anything else?

It has a lot in common with transgender and I suspect it’ll go the same way - the ‘identity’ will start to eventually lose its grip as people move onto a new one.

I agree its become like the trans debate, if you question the over diagnosis you're being discriminatory.

The very fact there is over diagnosis means that 'everyone' has it do those thst really need get lumped in with ll the border line cases - and its diluted down.

With celebs its now more unusual for them not to have adhd than to have it. ..

ProudCat · 09/10/2026 22:03

Rubydobydo · 09/10/2026 15:22

I suppose it could be considered rude, I’ll take that.
To explain my interest - my children are 32 and 31. Amongst their contemporaries I knew two brothers, both highly academically intelligent, that were diagnosed with dyspraxia. They were taken out of primary and put into a fee paying school (whether that made any difference I do not know) and are now successful adults with careers, albeit their dad jokes that they still can’t ride a bike.
And going back to my school years in the 60/70s we had kids that were less able but got on with it. I recall one family that were all what was called “a bit thick” but all went onto work as farm labourers and so on, had families of their own - succeeded at life in other words.
But I also knew that some children needed ‘special education’. I have no idea of what happened to those children, something I expect would have been common.

What intrigues me now is why so many are receiving a diagnosis, indeed why so many are displaying quite life limited traits such as being non-verbal, whatever.

I absolutely support the idea that everyone deserves an education, and that everyone deserves to be part of mainstream life. But is the current provision, and the growing number deemed in need proving a disadvantage to all?

I have no skin in the fight. I have two infant grandchildren, both of whom seem engaging and engaged. But talking about this with my DiL this morning, she says that despite 14 years as a nanny, she doesn’t understand why some children don’t respond to what she called ‘normal parental upbringing’, whether that be directly by a parent or their proxy, such as a nanny or childminder.
Thats why I’m interested.

What the hell are you talking about?

In the 1960s and 1970s kids weren't 'getting on with it', they were labelled as educationally subnormal (ESN it was called) and shipped off to warehousing facilities so they wouldn't bother anyone else. Just because you didn't see it, doesn't mean it wasn't happening. Christ, in the mid-1970s my sister worked in a children's home full of these kids that had been dumped, and in 1987 I worked in a 'home' for some of these children, largely non-verbal, incredibly distressed, unimaginably violent.

It was just completely hidden so that everyone could ignore it and get on with their lives.

Rubydobydo · 09/10/2026 22:08

ProudCat · 09/10/2026 22:03

What the hell are you talking about?

In the 1960s and 1970s kids weren't 'getting on with it', they were labelled as educationally subnormal (ESN it was called) and shipped off to warehousing facilities so they wouldn't bother anyone else. Just because you didn't see it, doesn't mean it wasn't happening. Christ, in the mid-1970s my sister worked in a children's home full of these kids that had been dumped, and in 1987 I worked in a 'home' for some of these children, largely non-verbal, incredibly distressed, unimaginably violent.

It was just completely hidden so that everyone could ignore it and get on with their lives.

Don’t be rude. My posts are about filling holes in my knowledge and understanding. I have enough humility to admit that.

OP posts:
BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:12

dippy567 · 09/10/2026 21:58

I agree its become like the trans debate, if you question the over diagnosis you're being discriminatory.

The very fact there is over diagnosis means that 'everyone' has it do those thst really need get lumped in with ll the border line cases - and its diluted down.

With celebs its now more unusual for them not to have adhd than to have it. ..

There are so many “professionals” who believe it’s massively over diagnosed but they can’t say anything. It’s best to keep your mouth shut, keep diagnosing, and roll with the gravy train. It’s not worth sticking your head above the parapet for.

Dexternight · 09/10/2026 22:17

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:12

There are so many “professionals” who believe it’s massively over diagnosed but they can’t say anything. It’s best to keep your mouth shut, keep diagnosing, and roll with the gravy train. It’s not worth sticking your head above the parapet for.

This.
It will help noone in the long run.

Too many invested in this. It provides them with jobs so they are not going against the grain and admit to the over diagnosis.

suburburban · 09/10/2026 22:18

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:12

There are so many “professionals” who believe it’s massively over diagnosed but they can’t say anything. It’s best to keep your mouth shut, keep diagnosing, and roll with the gravy train. It’s not worth sticking your head above the parapet for.

Yes it is like a growth industry.

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:18

Dexternight · 09/10/2026 22:17

This.
It will help noone in the long run.

Too many invested in this. It provides them with jobs so they are not going against the grain and admit to the over diagnosis.

Of course not. They would be struck off. They’re stuck in the system too.

LivelyGreyShark · 09/10/2026 22:20

4DCheckmate · 09/10/2026 21:11

Like I said, the medical journals contain hundreds of statistically validated studies that have been peer reviewed and published covering everything from why ND children cannot function in the current state school system; to the damage to mental health that forcing them into an inappropriate environment causes; to the mental health damage caused by being in an environment that’s overwhelming in which they are forced to mask for most of their waking hours; to the fact that their risks of self-harm, suicide, rape and sexual abuse, addiction etc are all elevated 10-20 times higher than in the general population as a result of being placed in such environments. There are genetic studies showing the magnifying glass effect I mentioned i.e. the effects of both positive and negative environments are magnified for these children, evidencing the “dandelions/ orchids” distinction with autistic genetics being effectively a highly leveraged evolutionary bet. These genes have spread across the population and not died out despite the immense suffering of individuals who carried them being misunderstood and mistreated despite their outsized contribution to human society, because they these genes are good for human society; there’s a reason why a vastly disproportionate number of our entrepreneurs, mathematicians, engineers, scientists, composers, artists, authors, inventors, etc are autistic. If given the right environment these children flourish, to everyone’s benefit. You’d probably have nothing like the creature comforts you enjoy without autistic people. But if forced into a hostile and unsuitable environment, the children carrying these genes are vastly more likely to crash and burn, than an NT child subjected to the same level of hostility. The data on this is indisputable.

Anybody pretending “we don’t know why this is happening” is either ignorant, or lying. Far more research of course needs doing, but it’s already very clear and indisputable what needs to be done to improve things, yet we have politicians suggesting the opposite. Then they’ll blame these children for the fact that their own policies, which ignored all of the existing evidence, trashed these children’s lives, and pretend it’s their fault. It’s not. It’s the fault of all of the ignorant people who can’t be bothered to read the medical research, or refrain from making children with disabilities a scapegoat and political issue when frankly, it’s an absolute joke that this is anybody’s focus when you look at the laughable mismanagement of every single aspect of UK administration from the economy to trade policy to tax policy to public service management and design.

Disabled children are yet another victim of this incompetence - extremely vulnerable ones who, very conveniently, are in no position to fight back or vote against this. They are quite clearly not the cause of the UK’s problems, so perhaps the Government should focus on implementing some policies that improve the economy rather than trash it further, for a change. Then, perhaps, they might be able to fund functional health and education services rather than blaming the citizens who need to use these services for their own failings.

I don't think anyone is disputing that neurodivergent children can face serious difficulties in unsuitable educational environments, or that better support is needed.

But you're making some very sweeping claims here. For example, that the increased risks of suicide, abuse and addiction are caused by school environments, that autistic genetics explain the orchid/dandelion effect, and that autistic people are disproportionately responsible for major scientific and cultural achievements. Those are very different claims, and each would need its own supporting evidence.

Even where research establishes significantly increased risks, that doesn't necessarily establish what causes them. That's the distinction between correlation and causation you originally criticised the government review for overlooking.

I'm also not sure why you're treating criticism of the government's proposed policies as proof that its evidence review is scientifically invalid. It's entirely possible to oppose particular policies while recognising that the underlying evidence is complex.

I'm happy to look at research supporting specific claims, but repeatedly referring to hundreds of studies and describing the conclusions as indisputable isn't a substitute for demonstrating what the evidence actually establishes.

Dexternight · 09/10/2026 22:23

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:18

Of course not. They would be struck off. They’re stuck in the system too.

All a big con.

I'm also sick of the phrase especially used by celebrities, '"It all makes sense now". They all say it.

caveat - I am also not referring to individuals who quite clearly have learning disabilities.

Owninterpreter · 09/10/2026 22:26

Its a strange article as she says we shouldn't rush to diagnose adhd and then fobb children off with medication children we should just tackle the specific problems eg emotional regulation and just name the problem it that and deal with it. But medication isnt widespread

And isnt it easier to say adhd, than list tackling emotional regulation problems, a communication problems, processing problemn sensory difficulties, impulsiveness, inattention, hyperactivity or whatever all the symptoms are (not an adhd household)

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 22:28

Dexternight · 09/10/2026 22:23

All a big con.

I'm also sick of the phrase especially used by celebrities, '"It all makes sense now". They all say it.

caveat - I am also not referring to individuals who quite clearly have learning disabilities.

Edited

It’s like bingo

  • I always knew I was different.
  • I thought everyone was like this.
  • My whole life makes sense now.
  • I wish I’d known sooner.
  • I’ve spent my whole life masking.
  • I’m not lazy — it’s executive dysfunction.
  • WAIT… that’s an ADHD thing?!
  • I thought that was just my personality.
  • I’ve been playing life on hard mode.
  • I was the gifted child who burned out.
  • My school reports make SO much sense now.
  • I have a new hyperfixation every week.
  • I either do everything or absolutely nothing.
  • I need three business days to recover from socialising.
  • I’ve been exhausted from pretending to be normal.
  • I can’t start the task, but I can think about it for six hours.
  • I’m either 10 minutes early or 40 minutes late.
  • I forgot why I walked into this room.
  • I’ve been researching ADHD for 14 hours.
  • I’m not ignoring you — I forgot to reply.
  • My brain has 47 tabs open.
  • I have a special interest and I WILL tell you about it.
  • I finally feel seen.
  • Now I’m grieving the life I could have had.
  • Apparently, being told I was bright but didn’t apply myself was a clue.
  • I thought I was a terrible partner. Turns out I struggle with executive functioning.
  • You’re telling me other people can just hear a fridge humming and ignore it?
  • I can spend eight hours researching something but can’t put a wash on.
  • Someone used a slightly different tone of voice and now I think they hate me.
  • I love people. I just need to recover from them.
  • Five minutes and 45 minutes feel exactly the same.
  • I’ve been manually calculating the rules of social interaction my entire life.
  • I genuinely don’t know who I am when I’m not trying to fit in.
  • I’m relieved, angry, and heartbroken all at once.
  • Is this ADHD, autism, trauma, or just me?
  • I’ve found my people.
  • I didn’t become neurodivergent when I was diagnosed. I finally had a name for something that had always been there.

Ill stop there 🤦‍♀️.

I mean, who knew that human beings were all so different and complex? Wild.

JemappelleClaude · 09/10/2026 22:28

I think there will be major regrets one day. We have this generation of autistic/ADHD children who are "on the spectrum" but in the case of my autistic child, so barely that no one would ever know. I think by telling the HFA people they can just let it all go and not even attempt to come to societal norms we are going to have a really screwed up future generation who won't be employable, and in an economic climate where they are unlikely to just be given help with the way the UK is going. Our psychologist on the assessment basically said that since sensory issues are now on the autism spectrum, most people are diagnosable with it, and I agree that it detracts from people with extreme autism. For what its worth, I know adults who lean into it. I know someone who was fired from their job due to drug addiction but then claimed autism and discrimination.

dizzydizzydizzy · 09/10/2026 22:30

BeautifulLittlePumpkin · 09/10/2026 21:52

Because it’s their job, it’s their profession. Mental health has always been big business. We need the stigma, even though society pretends it doesn’t. What on earth would all these professionals do, if we all suddenly became a nation of functioning, regulated individuals? Shit themselves, that’s what. It’s created a whole industry. ADHD coaches, SEN tutors, the list is endless.

Have you ever sat in a MDT team meeting? Professionals disagree all the time. Take mental health, whatever lens you want to apply. Biological, psychological, social, occupational, psychoanalytical….. why not add neurodevelopmental to the list? Hate to break it to you, but they’re just pulling a pay cheque and ticking the boxes too. And you’re the one who’s called me delusional? Interesting.

*caveat - I am not referring to individuals who quite clearly have learning disabilities.

So because professionals are earning a living from their work, that makes them inherently suspect?!

MDT disagreements! Whatever next! Anyone would
think that medicine is complicated with lots of grey areas and uncertainty. Disagreements are not evidence of incompetence or fraud or whatever.

RlastR · 09/10/2026 22:32

SupernaturalAddict · 09/10/2026 21:51

I agree epigenetics is much more likely.

NAS have done a huge disservice by implying autism is passed on soley from parents. Even their own website lists other causes which they have chosen to down play as it doesn't fit with their narrative, again politics at play.

There are a number of medical (and neurological) conditions which are thought to be genetic in origin but with “triggers”. Finding the triggers is not easy though as it can be different in different people

Monty36 · 09/10/2026 22:34

4DCheckmate · 09/10/2026 18:32

Not necessarily. Some private consultant and specialists are actually far, far more robust and detailed in their diagnostic processes than the useless NHS.

I said the Government are concerned about disreputable organisations.
Not my views.

seahorsessky · 09/10/2026 22:38

RlastR · 09/10/2026 10:00

Yes I have worked with this group of young adults and it’s horrifying to see the massive increase in numbers who are leaving school and unable to engage with the next steps. It’s really worrying to see the huge rise in numbers of children needing a lot of support to make it through school as society is not going to provide that level of support for them to live a normal adult life with all that entails.
This is why I think research is so important here. We can’t help our kids and young people effectively if we don’t understand what it is about modern life that is causing so many not to be able to cope.

Most people could reasonably expect a job, partner and house in the past, though. Things are definitely much harder now. We now have Oxbridge grads unemployed, and far fewer people can afford to buy a house (especially on one wage) and settled relationships are far more rare. Children from "broken homes are far more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD" (Times et al).