It’s being referred to in this discussion as a diagnosis. It’s an incredibly wishy washy undefined term, and as I say, is being used as a label rather than the political intention, and also specifically for Asperger’s.
We could replace every single “neurodivergent” word in this conversation with the word “disabled.” Or Disorder. Does my child have a disorder. At 2.5, with the associated descriptions of how she’s doing at nursery, it’s clearly far too early to say such a thing.
Neurodivergent also includes bi polar, schizophrenia etc. There are links between schizophrenia and autism too, the term autism came from reasearch into schizophrenia and 10% of children diagnosed go onto develop it / be re diagnosed as adults.
I do have an issue with parents of under 3s wondering their child is disabled when nursery isn’t realising any concerns yet.
I don’t have an issue with parents asking if they should raise these extreme tantrums with the HV and ask for support with them. And double checking gross motor issues. the HV who’s posted on this thread makes good suggestions so I now do think it’s worth seeing HV and double checking things with nursery.
I never found my HV helpful but I’m a teacher and also teach children aged 10 / 11 who still behave in the way the OP describes which is certainly outwith “normal” and a significant issue for the child, their parents and all their social connections, as well as learning. I have remembered that a friend with a son who behaved like this, well into reception, found the HV very helpful. His tantrums were epic. I remember her dealing with one in the street on the way to school. He’s actually great now. Her other child has been diagnosed with autism, but fits the old Asperger’s profile. But didn’t behave like that.
What the OP means is, was your child diagnosed with anything. Unfortunately none of us have a crystal ball. It’s pertinent to note that adhd and sometimes (now, since the changes to diagnostic criteria) autism diagnosis are not “firm” or fixed when diagnosed in childhood. Especially if a lot of support is given. ADHD in particular was always something most children grow out of, especially with supportive interventions - so are we really referring to a child who’s taking longer than others to mature?
The issue with diagnosis - for over 20 years in my experience - is that we wait for that before any support is given. It makes more sense to say “we’ve noticed these challenges, what helps?” And provide that support. Sometimes then, a diagnosis isn’t needed. The issue is that schools haven’t been doing that. Because the government hadn’t made it a priority.
Not all children like to be diagnosed. I know of some older teens who’ve had issues and now have the diagnosis and hate it. “De diagnosis” is now a thing in some countries. Another teen whose school raised the possibility but his Gp dad didn’t go down that route for specific reasons (he’s exceptionally clever and his sibling does have autism and LD). I know of teachers who aren’t seeking diagnosis of adhd for their son, partly as the gp told them that everyone referred gets the diagnosis, and they know their son is bright enough to learn to regulate better.
A diagnosis can also be limiting for the individual due to the social idea that it’s fixed or the nocebo effect - “I can’t do this because I have xyz.” They’re not really “diagnosing” dyslexia now in many cases as we now know how to provide intensive support for children to support that specific learning difficulty.
In SEND, the diagnosis is often irrelevant as we make the environment suit the child’s needs.
I’ve known for a long time that the school system is creating a false idea of normal. It’s got much worse in the last decade and is driving some of these later diagnoses. It’s is very much sounding like schools will be being asked to provide enough support that a child doesn’t need a label of “disorder”
there’s also the issue of, what happens if the child DOESNT get the diagnosis? They still have the same issues. What happens then? You provide support for those issues. So what was the point of diagnosis?
Sorry for the length of this post and my strong feelings but I have worked in schools for 25 years, 20 in SEND and seen a significant drop in actual support for children and their needs, with a growing chasing of labels. Which lead to nothing. Good child psychology has always said that we should label children. For very good reason. The evidence is beginning to build that it is much better just to define needs and challenges and provide support.
So yes op, do see the HV but simply ask for any assistance with the tantrums and the gross motor skills - though you already seemed to have worked out that perhaps more opportunities for physical play she enjoys would help.