Just posting on the off chance anyone has experience with this.
My DS was born with a squint in his right eye (so his eye turns inward) which as a result is affecting his vision. He’s autistic so has some sensory issues and won’t tolerate their ‘treatment options’ which have been glasses and eye patches. He’ll just relentlessly take them off. Essentially they’re trying to cover his good eye to make him use the other eye but he has no understanding of this, so quite frankly I understand why he’s distressed when you’re covering the only eye he can see out of properly! He’s now 4 and we’re no further along progress wise. But they’re said they’re the only treatment options available so if he won’t tolerate it then basically he could lose his vision. I just feel this is really unfair as it’s not his fault! So I’m just hoping someone else has some knowledge around this. I’m been trying to push for surgery to correct the squint but initially they said they won’t do that until all other options have been tried first. They then told me they couldn’t do surgery until he’s older as he won’t sit still long enough for them to get proper measurements of his eyes. But today they told me that surgery won’t change his eyesight and described it as more of a cosmetic procedure that I can look into when he’s older if I wanted. But given that the surgery would correct his eye so that it’s straight, surely this would mean his ability to use it is greater than now and therefore this may decrease the likelihood of his vision getting worse?!! Not sure if it’s worth trying to see if I can afford a private consultation just for a second opinion