She said he has £2.7k per month in net pay, so I agree the point is moot and she’s unlikely to be entitled to choose not to work and claim benefits instead (one would hope) unless there’s some huge drip feed about extenuating circumstances she’s neglected to mention.
However, in general, why should a SAHM be funded for people who would prefer claiming benefits at the expense of other parents whose taxes will have to go up even more to fund these benefits for people who are capable of working? Why does the child of the former deserve taxpayer money to fund having a SAHP while as a result the second gets to see even less of their own parents to pay for this?
Are you proposing that benefits should be paid at a (much higher) level that is sufficient to make it viable for one parent to stay at home with their child in all circumstances until their child reaches X age? If so, how will this be funded?
Or are you proposing that children with parents who live in cheap areas/ parents who live in Council housing who can survive on the level of benefits paid currently should be provided with funding for a SAHP regardless of need and capability to work, and obviously rich people like Ms Badenoch can be a SAHP for several years funded by their wealthy partner, but all of those children with parents who are neither rich nor poor so cannot afford to live on benefits don’t deserve/ require a SAHP and should see their own parents even less, as an ever larger proportion of their parents’ earned income is swallowed up by tax to fund those claiming these unnecessary benefits? If so, please explain why it is beneficial for a SAHP for some children to be funded by others to the detriment of time with their own children. What makes it good for some children to have a SAHP - so essential we must all pay for it - and other children apparently not only don’t require this in your view but should have a lower standard of living to enable this for others?
Some (children) are more worthy than others, I guess. Animal farm being played out in UK society.